reports I/O errors and doesn't failover the controler.
Any ideas?
Thanks for any help
Nuno Fernandes
___
rhelv5-list mailing list
rhelv5-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
through passive links to ask the
storage to failover the LUNs active controller. This isn't working.
Any info?
Thanks
Nuno Fernandes
On Sunday 23 September 2007 21:20:27 Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On 2007-09-22, Nuno Fernandes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've bought and IBM BladecenterH
On Monday 24 September 2007 13:19:14 Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On 2007-09-24, Nuno Fernandes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have 4 paths to each lun.
(a) HBA1 == DS4x00 controller A LUNx
(b) HBA1 ~~ DS4x00 controller B LUNx
(c) HBA2 == DS4x00 controller A LUNx
through passive links to ask the
storage to failover the LUNs active controller. This isn't working.
Any info?
Thanks
Nuno Fernandes
On Sunday 23 September 2007 21:20:27 Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On 2007-09-22, Nuno Fernandes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've bought and IBM BladecenterH
On Monday 24 September 2007 22:56:26 Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On 2007-09-24, Nuno Fernandes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With engenio/rdac that's what you have if you're lucky, but you might
just as well be unlucky and get:
(a) HBA1 == DS4x00 controller A LUNx
(b) HBA1
one active
path.
When both active paths fail, it requests through the passive path the failover
of the lun and both passive paths transform in active ones.
Thanks
Nuno Fernandes
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 11:07:15 Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On 2007-09-25, Nuno Fernandes [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Friday 28 September 2007 15:39:53 Peter Ruprecht wrote:
Kernel sources for the latest updates (
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0936.html ) are not available at
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Client/en/os/SRPMS or
in the 5Server dir, could someone please push
are not yet supported.
I'm using lvm2-cluster-2.02.16-3.el5 and RHEL5.0.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Nuno Fernandes
___
rhelv5-list mailing list
rhelv5-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
hello,
I'm not sure but for what i recall, multipath is unable (for now) to update
the size based on it's low level devices. The only way is to use dmsetup to
stop that specific multipath device and add it again..
Rgds.
./npf
On Thursday 07 February 2008 22:56:08 Troels Arvin wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
With a cluster of only clvmd is it possible to do a rolling upgrade from 5.0
to 5.1?
By rolling upgrade i mean,
1 - select 1 node
2 - leave the node from cluster
3 - upgrade to 5.1
4 - join to cluster
5 - go to step 1
Any info?
Thanks,
Nuno Fernandes
using both clustered and non-clustered lvm on the same machine and i
don't have that problem.. Everything is working fine.
Best regards,
Nuno Fernandes
I don't think you are doing anything wrong.
Regards,
Daniel
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
On Monday 05 May 2008 18:01:32 Collins, Kevin [Beeline] wrote:
Which version of lvm2-cluster are you using?
lvm2-cluster-2.02.26-1.el5
Are you subscribed to the
Beta channel for Cluster Storage?
Nopz.. I'm using centos.
Best regards,
Nuno Fernandes
I am running the standard version
What about windows pv drivers from redhat? Is there any news on that? Any
timeline?
Thanks
Nuno Fernandes
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 16:56:39 solarflow99 wrote:
I see the RHN is so busy I can't even download anything from there, hehe
-- Forwarded message --
From: rhelv5
Hi,
We have 7 blades that are having a problem in clvmd:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# vgdisplay -C
Error locking on node blade06: Command timed out
Error locking on node blade05: Command timed out
Error locking on node blade06: Command timed out
Error locking on node blade05: Command timed out
It states that the directory in my harddisk/USB stick should contain the
variant directory of the installation tree.
Does anyone know how can i install from an exploded tree?
Thanks,
Nuno Fernandes
___
rhelv5-list
Hello,
It's formated with iso9660 (cdrom format). It's generated using isohybrid.
The iso created should install from cdrom and from usb..
Best regards,
Nuno Fernandes
On Thursday 27 October 2011, Bryan J Smith wrote:
Is it formatted with an inode file system like Ext3 or Ext4? Or did you
in
/dev/sdc1 and not the iso files.
Booting the ISO file from CDROM and using a kickstart with cdrom method it
works fine.
Thanks for any help,
Nuno Fernandes
On Wednesday 02 November 2011, Bryan J Smith wrote:
I thought you stated you exploded the ISO on to the USB? That's why I
asked what file
several host machines (centos6, mandriva) and despite using
differente kvm versions in the host the end result is the same.
Any ideas? Does the virtio_(blk|net) only work as modules and not builtin?
Thanks,
Nuno Fernandes
___
rhelv5-list mailing list
rhelv5
Hello,
I have a server with centos5 installed and 2.6.18-308.4.1.el5xen kernel with
the following modules:
Cut upper list
ata_piix 57925 0
libata208849 1 ata_piix
shpchp 70637 0
mptsas 87633 2
mptscsih 71489 1
On Thursday 30 August 2012 06:25:52 Bryan J Smith wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Nuno Fernandes npf-mli...@eurotux.com
wrote:
Hello,
I have a server with centos5 installed and 2.6.18-308.4.1.el5xen kernel
with the following modules ...
The important part is the mptsas module
On 08/30/2012 12:51 PM, Bryan J Smith wrote:
Nuno Fernandes npf-mli...@eurotux.com wrote:
Yes.. that coud happen.
Maybe I should step back ...
What are your _requirements_? I.e., what is driving you to do this?
What is preventing you from going with an actual, full EL6 platform
On 08/30/2012 01:49 PM, Bryan J Smith wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Nuno Fernandes npf-mli...@eurotux.com wrote:
Let me then start from the beginning... We are creating an opensource
virtualization solution called Nuxis (http://nuxis.com/). This solution is
based on Centos5 + some
.elrepo
# CONFIG_XEN is not set
# CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST is not set
I'll try to rebuild it with xen dom0 to test it.
Best regards,
Nuno Fernandes
___
rhelv5-list mailing list
rhelv5-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5
by full dom0 support.
kernel-2.6.39uek has backported those drivers because of their oracleVM
product that uses the same kernel.
Back to debug mode :(
Best regards,
Nuno Fernandes
___
rhelv5-list mailing list
rhelv5-list@redhat.com
https
As I understand it, 2.6.39uek = 3.0.16. The versioning is for their
tool compatibility, even though it should be 2.6.40.16 under the
commonly accepted versioning for 2.6.x IIRC. And allegedly Xen went
upstream early in 3.x. Was it 3.0.3? Or was that 3.3?
I think it was in 3.0. But it
25 matches
Mail list logo
