Hi.
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 17:51 +0100, Corey Kovacs wrote:
Some of my users came to me today asking where xemacs went after a
RHEL5.2 install. I didn't have a good answer for them except that
someone seems to have decided that in RHEL, xemacs is dead. I am
curious who made that decision and
Well, it seems that the xemacs I was looking for is actually called
emacs-x in RHEL5.
-C
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Stephen John Smoogen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Stephen John Smoogen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Corey
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Corey Kovacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it seems that the xemacs I was looking for is actually called
emacs-x in RHEL5.
Oh I can see how that can cause some confusion:
xemacs -- http://www.xemacs.org
emacs-x -- http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
Hope the
Corey Kovacs wrote:
Well, it seems that the xemacs I was looking for is actually called
emacs-x in RHEL5.
If you do a
rpm -f `which emacs-x`
it should point back to the emacs package. The gnu emacs package
supplies emacs-x and emacs-nox (with/without X11 at startup).
From the emacs RPM
Some of my users came to me today asking where xemacs went after a
RHEL5.2 install. I didn't have a good answer for them except that
someone seems to have decided that in RHEL, xemacs is dead. I am
curious who made that decision and why? I am not an emacs user but I
find it hard to digest that
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Corey Kovacs wrote:
Some of my users came to me today asking where xemacs went after a
RHEL5.2 install. I didn't have a good answer for them except that
someone seems to have decided that in RHEL, xemacs is dead. I am
curious who made that decision and why? I
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Corey Kovacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of my users came to me today asking where xemacs went after a
RHEL5.2 install. I didn't have a good answer for them except that
someone seems to have decided that in RHEL, xemacs is dead. I am
curious who made that
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Stephen John Smoogen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Corey Kovacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of my users came to me today asking where xemacs went after a
RHEL5.2 install. I didn't have a good answer for them except that
someone