RE: [Robots] Yahoo evolving robots.txt, finally

2004-03-13 Thread ogjunk-robots
--- Matthew Meadows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree with Walter. So do I, partially. :) There's a lot of variables that should have been considered for this new value. If nothing else the specification should have called for the time in milliseconds, or otherwise allow for fractional

Re: [Robots] Yahoo evolving robots.txt, finally

2004-03-13 Thread Walter Underwood
--On Saturday, March 13, 2004 2:22 AM -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does crawl-delay allow decimals? You think people really want to be able to tell a crawler to fetch a page at most every 5.6 seconds, and not 5? 0.5s would be useful. Ultraseek has used a float for the delay for the past

RE: [Robots] Yahoo evolving robots.txt, finally

2004-03-13 Thread Matthew Meadows
I'm standing firm on my suggestions. Adding a delay for crawlers is a good idea in concept, and allowing fractional seconds is a way for webmasters to request reasonable constraints. Is it such a stretch to allow a robot that you use to promote your business unmitigated access to your site, but