Looking at this bug
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=104932aid=1539726group_id=4932
I found that indeed, when you import a file which has less than 64 tracks, you
get into a situation where the track buttons on the left side of the canvas
are shorter than the canvas, so it's
On Tuesday 15 Aug 2006 08:34, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
I'm very tempted to enforce this at the composition level,
i.e. no composition can have less than 64 tracks.
I think that's a bad idea that wouldn't be at all popular with users.
Remember that one of the trends of our current development
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 11:46, Chris Cannam wrote:
On Tuesday 15 Aug 2006 08:34, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
I'm very tempted to enforce this at the composition level,
i.e. no composition can have less than 64 tracks.
I think that's a bad idea that wouldn't be at all popular with users.
[
On Tuesday 15 Aug 2006 11:46, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
I mostly agree with all those (and have committed a fix accordingly)
I don't see one -- are you sure you committed it?
Presenting a composition with a very small number of tracks just doesn't
look good, nor feels comfortable.
I honestly
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 17:13, Chris Cannam wrote:
On Tuesday 15 Aug 2006 11:46, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
I mostly agree with all those (and have committed a fix accordingly)
I don't see one -- are you sure you committed it?
I thought I had, but indeed I hadn't... I think eclipse didn't
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 22:29, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
should work that way. What you've done with the actual fix, rather than
the fix Chris talked you out of, is make Rosegarden's behavior match up
with my expectations. Vlada's too, apparently, and Chris's, and surely a
host of others
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 1:03 pm, you wrote:
* rearrange parameter boxes from track/segment/instrument to
segment/instrument/ track -- let's see what people say
I say boo.
It's actually segment/track/instrument here.
This strikes me as wrong, because I'm staring at an empty composition
On Tuesday, 15 August 2006 23:13, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 1:03 pm, you wrote:
* rearrange parameter boxes from track/segment/instrument to
segment/instrument/ track -- let's see what people say
It's actually segment/track/instrument here.
Same here.
I don't
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 5:29 pm, Chris Cannam wrote:
I don't find them comfortable, I don't use them, and I
probably never will - although I do kind of like them in
theory, and would understand if others did in
practice.
I'd probably never use them either if it weren't necessary to do so
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 5:54 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
I don't disagree with this arrangement for the vertical stacked layout of
the parameter area (it's not very relevant which parameter box is at the
top in this case) but the new default is the tabbed arrangement, and in
this case
On Wednesday, 16 August 2006 01:19, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 5:54 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
It is an arbitrary decision what is more important for the TPB: the
segment defaults, the playback parameters, or the recording filters. I
would agree with any
On Wednesday, 16 August 2006 01:19, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
I still use the old fashioned way to assign an
instrument to a track, but it's nice having the track's instrument choice
visible at the top. Of course I'm looking at it with the TPB on its own
tab, for now, because I have to. With
Am I genius or what? :)
Start rg and right click on tempo ruler -- menu is there.
Hit New icon and then right click on the same ruler -- menu is gone.
Vlada
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
On Wednesday, 16 August 2006 01:00, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 5:29 pm, Chris Cannam wrote:
I don't find them comfortable, I don't use them, and I
probably never will - although I do kind of like them in
theory, and would understand if others did in
practice.
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 7:31 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
I'm not proposing to change the order of the panels.
I'm not proposing that, either. I'm talking about which part of the track
parameter box should be hidden to save space in the vertical stacked mode.
Do you prefer to hide
15 matches
Mail list logo
