Re: CPP and COB

2002-07-12 Thread Michael Mattias/Tal Systems
- Original Message - From: Rachel Foerster [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WEDi/SNIP ID Routing' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:56 AM Subject: RE: CPP and COB Ken, If I'm not mistaken, the payer-to-payer model is currently what Medicare follows where Medicare

Re: CPP and COB [and companion guides]

2002-07-12 Thread William J. Kammerer
Chris: We're in luck: there are already a number of standard formats out there for representing implementation guides (or IG-like companion guides) in a machine-readable format: (1) IMPDEF, a standard UN/EDIFACT message, at http://www.unece.org/trade/untdid, (2) gXML (Guideline XML) at

RE: CPP and COB [and companion guides]

2002-07-12 Thread Larry Watkins
Chris -- Wow! Since you're a provider, this REALLY surprises me. And, again, I believe this is the wrong listserv to be discussing this. However, I would think that you would care very much if there are lots of 'flavors' of the claims standards. Why? Because ultimately the differences result

RE: CPP and COB [and companion guides]

2002-07-12 Thread Christopher J. Feahr, OD
Hi Larry, I guess I was on a bit of a tear this morning... maybe it was that third espresso! I would have to agree with you that during this transitional period (however long it turns out to be) we would be wise to keep claims as identical as humanly possible... partly because the law