My manifest has 500 entries of full paths about 45 characters each.. the
problem was as I said.. it got the ENOENT and skipped the manifest
loading. I removed that check and now it works.
I just haven't been able to track down where the ENOENT is set.
Attached is the workaround patch I'm
On Jul 3, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
Ok, I found the problem, but I don't know how to fix it.. The code in
lib/rpmgi.c
if (!(gi-flags RPMGI_NOHEADER)) {
h = rpmgiReadHeader(gi, fn);
if (h != NULL)
rpmrc = RPMRC_OK;
} else
On Jul 4, 2007, at 3:56 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 04:04:22PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
The manifest files don't seem to be working for me. But I can't
debug
rpm due to it being stripped.
A manifest file needs to be at least 96 bytes long (the size of
the rpm
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 06:27:02AM -0400, Jeff Johnson wrote:
On Jul 4, 2007, at 3:56 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
A manifest file needs to be at least 96 bytes long (the size of
the rpm lead). Maybe yours is too short?
Not true:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rpm44]$ cat q
time-1.7-27.i386.rpm
Jeff Johnson wrote:
On Jul 4, 2007, at 3:54 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
I am getting the following error after using rpm to install source
packages:
Is the srpm signed?
Add --nosignature to not access a rpmdb installing a src.rpm.
Alternatively, try importing the pubkey.
The above
Actually I think this patch is unneeded.
I do believe Mark has a typo in his manifest that he needs to correct
before we starting mucking about with rpmgi behavior.
73 de Jeff
On Jul 4, 2007, at 12:16 PM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
Mark Hatle wrote:
Jeff Johnson wrote:
Actually I think this patch is unneeded.
I do believe Mark has a typo in his manifest that he needs to correct
before we starting mucking about with rpmgi behavior.
Wait.. the system (due to the ENOENT) never got to the point of loading
the manifest.. so
Jeff Johnson wrote:
Actually I think this patch is unneeded.
I do believe Mark has a typo in his manifest that he needs to correct
before we starting mucking about with rpmgi behavior.
If having a typo in the manifest (on a query) causes a failure, this is
new behavior. The commands I am
On Jul 4, 2007, at 12:28 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
Mark Hatle wrote:
Jeff Johnson wrote:
Actually I think this patch is unneeded.
I do believe Mark has a typo in his manifest that he needs to
correct
before we starting mucking about with rpmgi behavior.
Wait.. the system (due to the
Reproducer. Build rpm5 HEAD as of about 15 minutes ago...
(remove the workaround for the ENOENT)
rpm5/HEAD/rpm/configure --disable-nls --with-libelf --without-selinux
--without-perl --without-python --with-zlib --with-bzip2 --with-beecrypt
--without-neon --with-file=internal --with-popt
On Jul 4, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
Reproducer. Build rpm5 HEAD as of about 15 minutes ago...
(remove the workaround for the ENOENT)
rpm5/HEAD/rpm/configure --disable-nls --with-libelf --without-selinux
--without-perl --without-python --with-zlib --with-bzip2 --with-
beecrypt
The only thing I can think of is it's either configuration or OS
dependent. I'm running FC7 currently.
--Mark
Jeff Johnson wrote:
On Jul 4, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
Reproducer. Build rpm5 HEAD as of about 15 minutes ago...
(remove the workaround for the ENOENT)
12 matches
Mail list logo
