NIce!
Be forewarned however:
RPM_I18NSTRING_TYPE - RPM_STRING_TYPE for
description/summary/group has already been achieved in rpm-5.4.9.
The remaining work (this month, will be in rpm-5.4.9 when released if
I don't get sucked into some CVE black hole) will propagate the
change
Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
NIce!
Be forewarned however:
RPM_I18NSTRING_TYPE - RPM_STRING_TYPE for
description/summary/group has already been achieved in rpm-5.4.9.
The remaining work (this month, will be in rpm-5.4.9 when released if
I don't get sucked into some CVE black
On Apr 6, 2012, at 12:28 PM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
NIce!
Be forewarned however:
RPM_I18NSTRING_TYPE - RPM_STRING_TYPE for
description/summary/group has already been achieved in rpm-5.4.9.
The remaining work (this month, will be in rpm-5.4.9 when
Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
I don't think changing devtool.conf to a db version that actually
exists/works is going to change that, but thanks for the warning.
./rpmdb/rpmdb.h:435: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before
'DB_SEQUENCE'
./rpmdb/rpmdb.h:492: error: expected
On Apr 6, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
I don't think changing devtool.conf to a db version that actually
exists/works is going to change that, but thanks for the warning.
./rpmdb/rpmdb.h:435: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before
