There's a segfault here when rindex returns NULL.
And POSIX strchr/strrchr, not *BSD index/rindex please.
73 de Jeff
On Apr 10, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
http://rpm5.org/cvs/
And try to avoid strstr please. The behavior
implemented in strstr(3) is sloppy and inevitably
(in my experience) leads to some bizarre corner case
breakage.
73 de Jeff
en
On Apr 10, 2011, at 2:57 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
http://rpm5.org/cvs/
This change MUST be tested and integrated somehow.
As long as there are no test cases and explicit test harnesses across
more than de facto Mandriva Cooker, well, the change cannot be Just Turned On.
There's all sorts of creeping crud that crawls out when RPM version comparison
changes, and
2011/1/25 Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com:
This change MUST be tested and integrated somehow.
I'm working on it, this is why my later commits are touching /tests. :)
I'm about to push a new cvs snapshot to cooker with 'make check'
(finally) enabled now,
you should see some new regression tests
2009/3/19 Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com
That's better, but there's still a fundamental flaw in what
you are attempting.
Data has endiannness, not CPU's.
Yes, but the order of the data read depends on the cpu..?
I'm not sure what you mean..
So a library for cpuinfo only provides (at
This is pointless crapola.
Endianness can be figured at run-time without all the baggage:
union _dbswap {
rpmuint32_t ui;
unsigned char uc[4];
};
static union _dbswap bigorlittle = { .ui = 0x00112233 };
bool littleendian = (bigorlittle.uc[0] != 0x00);
One does not need a library API
That's better, but there's still a fundamental flaw in what
you are attempting.
Data has endiannness, not CPU's.
So a library for cpuinfo only provides (at best) half of what
is needed, and the run-time detection of cpu endianness is trivially
done
whenever/wherever needed.
Tagging
On Mar 14, 2008, at 10:02 PM, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
Le samedi 15 mars 2008, Jeff Johnson a écrit :
Um, please start some discussion before just adding
two new dependency types to rpmds.
I'm strongly opposed to adding 2 new dependency types
within package content.
RPMSENSE_MISSINGOK to
On Jul 3, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007, Mark Hatle wrote:
Jeff Johnson wrote:
IMHO, this is the wrong fix.
per-system configuration belongs in the per-system configuration
directory, which is /etc everywhere.
scarcasm
Or perhaps I missed some n00bie
