@n3npq , you being the original author of where this originates from, would you
mind review the implementation, while also share some insights and thoughts on
the matter? :)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> Lua is the embedded language of rpm, end of story.
That's a statement, not an argument.
Specific issues related to iplementation were raised in #25 when closing it,
only partially addressed in #196, then fully addressed in this PR.
Your arbitrate statement cannot be considered as a valid
Closed #190.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/190#event-1492074446___
Rpm-maint mailing list
I would've thought closure of #25 and #96 made it fairly clear that it's the
functionality that is not wanted. The problem here isn't so much with the
implementation but the fact that we *don't want to* enable arbitrary embedded
language support in specs and macros. Lua is *the* embedded
Reopened #190.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/190#event-1481746956___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Closed #190.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/190#event-1481746644___
Rpm-maint mailing list
@Conan-Kudo could you take care of reopening this one?
I'm currently
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Reopened #190.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/190#event-1215322179___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Closed #190.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/190#event-1215322143___
Rpm-maint mailing list
@junaruga @proyvind It might need to be closed and reopened to trigger the CI
system to see it. I think @ignatenkobrain did that for a couple of other PRs...
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Thank you for that. But it seems that the CI test is not run for this PR..
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
rebased..
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/190#issuecomment-323117737___
Rpm-maint mailing list
@proyvind pushed 227 commits.
6b6b507 Drop dead-on-arrival untrustedkeys formatting from signature checking
886c417 Add a test for non-verbose signature check output
7de6172 Drop missing key formatting from non-verbose signature checking output
7488d88 Drop the ambiguous and bogus RSA/DSA
Hello, @proyvind
I am not a maintainer of this project.
However this project started to use CI recently.
So, it might be good to rebase your branch for PR on top of master branch.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on
This PR is now four months old, where not a single comment on it has been made.
The implementation is completely unintrusive and at possibility to even create
regressions, yet not a single feedback..?
What gives?
In contrast to the preceeding rpmpython PR, this one has addresses all issues
@proyvind pushed 1 commit.
fa515fc dlopen with RTLD_DEEPBIND
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/190/files/de807fa860a667ee1e09b1bcf97a2a555a76a1fd..fa515fcd83b2c8cbe1399b55b1b8fd00f060fa00
@proyvind pushed 1 commit.
de807fa drop md5 digest from download url
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
@proyvind pushed 5 commits.
da5ac98 move 'extern "C"' to top of file
e1a6125 use flexible array member for rpminterp->name
b94a62c fix enum
0cad264 add api doc for rpminterpLoad()
8215b22 revert variable array member change as it breaks C++ compatibility
--
You are receiving this because
@proyvind pushed 1 commit.
2e190d5 move handle out out of rpminterp API
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
@proyvind pushed 1 commit.
49f8f80 work around python setuptools not supporting unlimited jobs in pyspec()
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
@proyvind pushed 2 commits.
3750cb5 add md5 verification to pyspec()
dd27e48 really default to automatic archive selection for pyspec()
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
@proyvind pushed 1 commit.
03755b5 automatically pick latest version and preferred file format for
pyspec()
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
22 matches
Mail list logo
