Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Xz support improvements (#11)

This branch has been obsoleted by #17. Please close this and review that one. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/11#issuecomment-146226805___ Rpm-maint mailing list

[Rpm-maint] [rpm] Ensure defines are in place in fts.c and fts.h (#28)

It's not clear that `features.h` is included when it is supposed to be, and in fact it wasn't. This should correct that. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/28 -- Commit Summary -- * Ensure features.h is

[Rpm-maint] [rpm] Fix fstat64 implementation conditional and define typo (#29)

So, as it turns out, pretty much all libc implementations except for legacy ones implement it as `fstat64()`, so we will use `fstat64()` unless otherwise necessary. Also, fix typo in checking for `_D_EXACT_NAMLEN` definition. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Ensure defines are in place in fts.c and fts.h (#28)

Closed #28. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/28#event-463602765___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] initial embedded python interpreter support (@rpm5.org derived) (#25)

So, I gave it another go, and while the scriptlets seem to work now, interesting issues can come up. It causes segfaults in Yum and DNF, and I suspect anything that uses bindings to talk to RPM. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

[Rpm-maint] [rpm] Rename to pythonX.Ydist, read .dist-info, and support legacy pythoneggs()() (#35)

Per the recommendation of Nick Coghlan and Toshio Kuratomi, `pythonXegg(M)` is being renamed to `pythonX.Ydist(M)`. An option has also been added to add a `pythonXdist(M)` Provides for distributions that may prefer to have it. The option `--majorver-provides` is intended for use if only one

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] implement rpmbuild --changelog=FILE support (#69)

@proyvind Could the changelog be merged into the spec in an SRPM build or something? Otherwise, there would need to be a way to declare that a particular source in the spec provides the changelog. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] implement rpmbuild --changelog=FILE support (#69)

@proyvind This current approach means that you should probably have a "ChangelogFile" or some similar property that can be used in the preamble to override the default file name (but not the path). --- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on

[Rpm-maint] [rpm] Rename to pythonX.Ydist, read .dist-info, support legacy pythoneggs()(), and cleanups (#49)

This PR contains both #35 and #46 After reviewing the changes from @soig in #46, I've merged it into a new pull request, after doing some tweaking and git sorcery. This obsoletes #35 and #46. From #35 Per the recommendation of Nick Coghlan and Toshio Kuratomi, `pythonXegg(M)` is being

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Rename to pythonX.Ydist, read .dist-info, support legacy pythoneggs()(), and cleanups (#49)

Major change: introduction of attr file to enable the dependency generator by default. This pull request contains @soig's attr file to enable the dependency generator by default, adapted to also read python wheel data too. Do we want to enable this dependency generator by default in RPM,

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Rename to pythonX.Ydist, read .dist-info, and support legacy pythoneggs()() (#35)

Closed #35. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/35#event-517361915___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Rename to pythonX.Ydist, read .dist-info, and support legacy pythoneggs()() (#35)

This pull request has been superseded by #49. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/35#issuecomment-172375774___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] fixes for OS X (#57)

> @@ -560,6 +560,7 @@ dnl Checks for library functions. > AC_CHECK_FUNCS(putenv) > AC_CHECK_FUNCS(mempcpy) > AC_CHECK_FUNCS(fdatasync) > +AC_CHECK_DECLS(fdatasync, [], [], [#include ]) `fdatasync()` was just replaced with `fsync()` in 6151ac9a298a9fe560cf8f899dc0b0e67453446c. --- Reply to

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] fixes for OS X (#57)

> @@ -230,9 +230,9 @@ rpmvar_DATA = > > install-exec-hook: > @rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/rpmquery > - @LN_S@ ../../bin/rpm $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/rpmquery > + @LN_S@ rpm $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/rpmquery This is a problem here. I have no idea where "rpm" exists in this symlink creation

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] fixes for OS X (#57)

It's totally fine to submit this as a full pull request. If necessary, the maintainers of the project can cherry pick from a pull request. It makes life easier, in my opinion, to have them all in one pull request, anyway. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Doc (#48)

@cgwalters I'm not sure if I would say the Groups were a failure, unless you're willing to elaborate on why. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/48#issuecomment-176185394___

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Support Apache Subversion as SCM in the BUILD arena. (#55)

> @@ -1120,6 +1122,23 @@ done \ > %{__patch} %{-p:-p%{-p*}} %{-q:-s}\ > %{__bzr} commit %{-q} -m %{-m*} > > +# Subversion > +%__scm_setup_svn(q)\ > +%{__svnadmin} create .svnrepos\ > +%{__svn} mkdir %{-q} -m "Create directory structure." > file://`pwd`/.svnrepos/trunk\ > +%{__svn} checkout

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Permit dynamic selection of SCM. (#56)

@ascherer Eck, I didn't override the macro properly to test, that's why... It's all good to me :+1: --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/56#issuecomment-176159440___ Rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Support Apache Subversion as SCM in the BUILD arena. (#55)

> @@ -1120,6 +1122,23 @@ done \ > %{__patch} %{-p:-p%{-p*}} %{-q:-s}\ > %{__bzr} commit %{-q} -m %{-m*} > > +# Subversion > +%__scm_setup_svn(q)\ > +%{__svnadmin} create .svnrepos\ > +%{__svn} mkdir %{-q} -m "Create directory structure." > file://`pwd`/.svnrepos/trunk\ > +%{__svn} checkout

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Permit dynamic selection of SCM. (#56)

@ascherer It doesn't look like -S is supported anymore in `%autosetup`. Does `%autosetup -S git` or something like that still work correctly? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] fixes for OS X (#57)

> @@ -86,20 +90,7 @@ char * stpncpy(char * dest, const char * src, size_t n); > #define xstrdup(_str) rstrdup((_str)) > #define _free(_ptr) rfree((_ptr)) > > -/* Retrofit glibc __progname */ > -#if defined __GLIBC__ && __GLIBC__ >= 2 > -#if __GLIBC_MINOR__ >= 1 > -#define __progname

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] fixes for OS X (#57)

> @@ -230,9 +230,9 @@ rpmvar_DATA = > > install-exec-hook: > @rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/rpmquery > - @LN_S@ ../../bin/rpm $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/rpmquery > + @LN_S@ rpm $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/rpmquery I would suggest making a new pull request that adds a configure switch for changing

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Additional fixes for getprogname()/setprogname() on BSD systems (#58)

Looks good to me :+1: --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/58#issuecomment-184071948___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

[Rpm-maint] [rpm] Add all the BSDs that support setprogname() and getprogname() (#59)

NetBSD and OS X aren't the only BSD derivatives with support for `setprogname()` and `getprogname()`, so this PR adds the definitions for the rest of them. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/59 -- Commit Summary

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Fix symlinks for installations outside /usr/bin (#60)

@ffesti The actual problem is that `/bin/rpm` isn't valid when you install to `/usr/local`, and the symlinks unconditionally assume rpm is being installed systemwide. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Fix symlinks for installations outside /usr/bin (#60)

@ffesti What I was suggesting is that perhaps the following might solve the problem better: ``` @rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(rpmbindir)/rpmquery @LN_S@ -f $(rpmbindir)/rpm $(DESTDIR)$(rpmbindir)/rpmquery @rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(rpmbindir)/rpmverify @LN_S@ -f $(rpmbindir)/rpm $(DESTDIR)$(rpmbindir)/rpmverify

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Fix symlinks for installations outside /usr/bin (#60)

@petere After testing the patch, it seems like it's fine to me. I'm okay with it entering as-is. :+1: --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/60#issuecomment-186955079___ Rpm-maint

[Rpm-maint] [rpm] Fixes for building RPM with BeeCrypt (#61)

These days, normally RPM is built with NSS. However, it is desirable in some environments to use BeeCrypt as an alternative to NSS. In my case, I wanted to use BeeCrypt instead of NSS for RPM for OS X. In my quest to compile RPM for OS X, I have found a few things that needed to be fixed. The

[Rpm-maint] [rpm] Fix pkgconfig reference to Lua in Libs.private (#64)

The reference in `rpm.pc.in` is invalid and never gets filled in. By changing it to the correct reference for `configure.ac` substitution, it should work as expected. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/64 --

[Rpm-maint] [rpm] Use fuzz settings for %autopatch/%autosetup, if set (#63)

In the `%apply_patches` that inspired `%autopatch`, patch application respects the fuzz settings that are used for `%patch`. `%autopatch` and `%autosetup` weren't using this, which led to an inconsistent patch application behavior. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Use fuzz settings for %autopatch/%autosetup (#63)

If it's okay, could this also be applied to the rpm 4.13 branch? It's biting us hard in Mageia, and it'd be nice if this patch was included in the released rpm 4.13. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

[Rpm-maint] [rpm] Add x86_64 for Darwin in rpmrc, enabling x86_64 target (#65)

This pull request adds support for x86_64 for Darwin (Mac OS X) and adjusts the logic slightly so that in the event an architecture is not defined, it throws a warning. Depending on how the architecture is set up, RPM may or may not properly detect it, which is why this is a warning instead of

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpmplugin: don't mix tabs and spaces (#76)

Looks good to me!  @ffesti @lkardos: I think this is sufficiently trivial that it can go straight in... --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] configure.ac: use LIBDW always conditionally (#78)

@ffesti With this patch, I can build RPM on OS X again, so I'm happy with it. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fix preun scriptlet failure not aborting rpm erase (#74)

Looks good to me as well, just a matter of @ffesti or @lkardos doing the final review to pull it in. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] add brp helper scripts from mandriva's spec-helper (#122)

Conan-Kudo requested changes on this pull request. I'd prefer that the new extra scripts be disabled by default for now, rather than enabled by default. In addition, instead of using `dont_`, I'd suggest using `enable_` or `disable_` and wording it appropriately. That's consistent with other

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Allow SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH to override file timestamps (#144)

@fweimer I see, that makes much more sense. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/144#issuecomment-278350760___

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Does not the rpmbuild command execute (de)compression of files in parallel? (#113)

I would hazard to say I would _almost never_ recommend switching to multithreaded stuff by default, after accounting for how it would potentially break DeltaRPM. Unless there's a way to make _that_ deterministic, I see no pathway that would allow for widespread usage of multithreaded

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Allow SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH to override file timestamps (#144)

@toabctl I'm not particularly a fan of the late byte-compilation technique Debian uses, and I'd rather not propagate that down to everyone. However, @bmwiedemann's idea of getting the .py files set to `$SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH` to embed that in .pyc files is interesting. -- You are receiving this

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add OpenSSL crypto backend (#129)

So, I've had a chance to test this on MacOS... A few points of feedback: * The configure script _does not_ catch that OpenSSL 0.9.8zh is incompatible, and the build fails due to undeclared things (`EVP_PKEY_CTX` and `pkey_ctx` were mentioned before it bailed out). It needs some better checks to

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] add brp helper scripts from mandriva's spec-helper (#122)

Conan-Kudo commented on this pull request. > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +# If using normal root, avoid changing anything. +if [ -z "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" -o "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" = "/" ]; then + exit 0 +fi + +find "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" \( -type f -o -type l \) -name \*.la -print0 | Yay! -- You

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] add brp helper scripts from mandriva's spec-helper (#122)

Conan-Kudo commented on this pull request. > @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +# If using normal root, avoid changing anything. +if [ -z "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" -o "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" = "/" ]; then + exit 0 +fi + +INFODIR=`rpm --eval %{_infodir}/dir` + +dir="$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/$INFODIR" + +if [ -f $dir

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] python bindings are using system RPM instead of in-source one (#130)

I've encountered a similar issue when I was building pythonX-rpm by hand on PCLinuxOS when I was attempting to upgrade them from 4.8.1 to 4.12.0.1. There didn't appear to be an obvious way to fix this, as the setuptools is wont to refer to system libraries for linking rather than the ones

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Upgrade to work with lua 5.3 without compat mode (#166)

@daurnimator I'd prefer to see a PR for this to make it easier to review (even if it's marked as "WIP" for now). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fix pythondistdeps.py --provides for Python wheels (#154)

@ffesti Could you please merge this? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/154#issuecomment-279715293___ Rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] add brp helper scripts from mandriva's spec-helper (#122)

@proyvind If you are changing them to be disabled by default, then I don't particularly care if they are there, I suppose. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add OpenSSL crypto backend (#129)

Conan-Kudo approved this pull request. The changes look good to me for Linux, and it properly fails to allow usage of OpenSSL backend from the configure step on macOS. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: OpenSSL/LibreSSL as an alternative to NSPR/NSS or beecrypt (#119)

@Redfoxmoon3 OpenSSL support has now been merged into rpm git master with commit 64028f9a1c25ada8ffc7a48775f526600edcbf85.  -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: Offer LMDB as an alternative engine to BDB for rpmdb (#128)

Perhaps @hyc could provide some insight into whether the situation has improved any since the discussions that occurred in Red Hat Bugzilla. >From my point of view, the main issues I see are the following: * LMDB is not independently released (it's part of the OpenLDAP source tree) * The

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] pythondistdeps.py: Ensure that dist data used has py_version data (#80)

Reference: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368673 Reported-and-tested-by: Igor Gnatenko You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/80 -- Commit Summary -- * pythondistdeps.py: Ensure

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] build: fgetc returns int, not char. (#82)

Looks excellent to me!  -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/82#issuecomment-241387139___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] macros: make rpmsig's gpg command alterable (#85)

Looks good to me  -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/85#issuecomment-244376171___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Remove extra dependencies (#86)

Looks great to me! :+1: @ffesti @ignatenkobrain: What do you think? Can it be merged now? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improvements for xz support (#17)

Looks good to me!  @ffesti What do you think? -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/17#issuecomment-245801457___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Remove extra dependencies (#86)

@legionus I'd prefer to see a more detailed description in the commit itself for future reference. Otherwise, looks good to me! What do you think, @ffesti? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpm2archive: return EXIT_SUCCESS on successful processing of package (#94)

This PR changes `rpm2archive` so that in the event `RPMERR_ITER_END` is returned back from `process_package()`, it will consider it successful and return `EXIT_SUCCESS`. Thus, shell scripts will be able to use rpm2archive the same way as most tools. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Extend %changelog to support full timestamps (#903) (#93)

Conan-Kudo approved this pull request. Looks good to me. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improvements for xz support (#17)

@ffesti @ignatenkobrain Anyone have a chance to re-review after the rebase? -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] pythondistdeps.py: Add --majorver-only dependency switch (#84)

Tomas Orsava from the Fedora Python SIG requested that the dependency generator support only using `pythonXdist(M)` format for both Provides and Requires, so now this capability exists. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Extend %changelog to support full timestamps (#903) (#93)

@pavlinamv Would it be possible to support the date+time format where the year comes before the time? It's rather strange to see the year mentioned after the time. For example, your example date would be structured as: Mon Jan 6 2016 09:02:22 CEST -- You are receiving this because you are

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] python: remove redundant suffix in python module name in metadata (#97)

No one is quite sure why there's a redundant `-python` suffix, but the module isn't named that, and typically we want the name in the metadata to be the same as the name of the module. This has no effect on Python code itself, as it doesn't change the name of the installed module used in

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] implement rpmbuild --changelog=FILE support (#69)

@proyvind The most simple case would be for SUSE, who uses `%{name}.changes` for their changelog file name, though it's not currently in the correct form for RPM changelogs (that can easily change, though). But there may be other reasons (such as reusing changelog file or using a generated

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] appdata -> appstream, add support for metainfo files (#98)

These provides are specifically for packages providing AppStream files, which are either going to be `*.appdata.xml` or `*.metainfo.xml` files in `/usr/share/appdata` or `/usr/share/metainfo`. The upstream AppStream specification mandates *.metainfo.xml files installed into

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] configure.ac: Support detecting gpg2 for %__gpg and prefer gpg2 (#101)

@soig Removed the reference to Mageia, then. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/101#issuecomment-262324925___

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] appdata -> appstream, add support for metainfo files (#98)

Hmm, apparently there is a difference... https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/chap-Metadata.html -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] appdata -> appstream, add support for metainfo files (#98)

@ximion Would `as-metainfo` work better as a name than `appstream` or `metainfo`? I want it to be clear what this actually is (a form of AppStream data). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] appdata -> appstream, add support for metainfo files (#98)

I think I want to just leave it as `appstream()`, as then we won't get bitten again by changes in what actually bits of AppStream are called. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] appdata -> appstream, add support for metainfo files (#98)

@mlschroe That's not how @ximion explained it to me. He seemed to indicate that AppStream covers both aspects, and supersedes the old AppData spec. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Read the full date from RPM changelog (#95)

As of 57f94a582602f0353cdb17a02dc12c4461d4f32d, it's now possible to have proper changelogs with dates and times properly set. Thus, it makes sense to render this information by default. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Extend %changelog to support full timestamps (#903) (#93)

@pmatilai It would also be a pure extension of the existing changelog date stamp, as it would purely append new data in the date stamp, rather than mix it up a bit. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] When using %autopatch, create backup files with .~ suffix by def… (#109)

Conan-Kudo approved this pull request. Looks good to me. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Metatags (#107)

I'm a bit confused. What exactly are MetaTags supposed to do? You mention comps, are these supposed to be more like [SUSE's patterns](https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/system:install:head/patterns-openSUSE/patterns-openSUSE.spec?expand=1)? I can't quite tell what this is supposed to

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] When using %autopatch, create backup files with .~ suffix by def… (#109)

For those looking from GitHub and the URL is being weirdly borked, here's the bug: https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9832 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] When using %autopatch, create backup files with .~ suffix by def… (#109)

@proyvind @soig @ignatenkobrain Maybe it'd be better if it was not on by default? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] %include breaks if space is included in path (#125)

Does doing the following work? ```python rpm.expandMacro('%define _sourcedir "/home/cqi/my\ package/systemd/"') ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Support optionally creating backup files with %autopatch or %autosetup (#110)

@pmatilai so you'd want instead a `-S patchbackup` backend instead of using `-B` at `%autosetup`/`%autopatch`? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Support optionally creating backup files with %autopatch or %autosetup (#110)

@pmatilai I'm tempted to not modify the default backend because of reasons mentioned by @soig and @ignatenkobrain in #109. But let me see what I can do about introducing an alternative backend that creates patch backups. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: Offer LMDB as an alternative engine to BDB for rpmdb (#128)

I think most of us are keenly aware that Berkeley DB 5.x is dead. While Oracle has Berkeley DB 6.x, it is licensed AGPLv3, which seems to make some people rather skittish. As a potential alternative, why not use [LMDB](https://symas.com/products/lightning-memory-mapped-database/)? Projects

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] find-lang.sh: Add --with-kde KF5 support (#112)

Conan-Kudo approved this pull request. Looks good to me! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpmsign: don't create & free NULL pointer (#111)

@pmatilai Well, can you merge it and then delete the branch? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] configure.ac: reference zlib when checking libmagic (#118)

The correct change is to get the file/libmagic project to ship a file for pkg-config to use and stop relying on creaky manual tests. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: OpenSSL/LibreSSL as an alternative to NSPR/NSS or beecrypt (#119)

I believe @sgallagher from the Fedora Modularity group also was interested in this... Snippet from `#rpm.org` conversation back in October requesting it: ``` [Monday, October 17, 2016] [12:54:05 PM EDT] ffesti: I know this is going to be a controversial question, but how hard would it be to

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpm2cpio and rpm2archive: don't write archive data to a terminal. (#116)

Conan-Kudo approved this pull request. Looks fantastic to me! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add armv5tl support (#179)

This patch adds support for `armv5tl`, which we have been using in Mageia to support an ARM port for a while now, and is an officially supported architecture for Mageia 6. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/179

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add macros to generate --enable-/disable- arguments (#176)

I'd defer to @pmatilai and @ffesti on this, but from my point of view, I'd just name them something like `cfg_enable`, `cfg_disable`, `cfg_with`, `cfg_without`... -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add armv5tl support (#179)

@ignatenkobrain `armv5tl` is the base armv5 architecture without any extensions. There's not much "real" hardware using "just" this, but it provides maximal compatibility across the 32-bit ARM ecosystem today, as it's a soft-float arch with just the common subset of instructions supported by

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Accept --nocaps also for the package installation (#178)

@lkundrak Could you please also add the required information to `doc/rpm.8`? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add armv5tl support (#179)

Also, we use armv5tl to support Raspberry Pi 1 and older random ARM hardware. Modern 32-bit ARM stuff is simultaneously supported with armv7hl variant. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add support for ARM 64bit (aarch64) - Add arm32 and arm64 macros (#173)

@myungjoo If I recall correctly, armv8 arches are the 32-bit descriptions of aarch64. So why not just add support for armv8 arch names? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add armv5tl support (#179)

Thanks! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/179#issuecomment-288380953___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add macro to force fsync() on close() (#187)

@jaymzh Could you add information to `doc/rpm.8` about the command line option? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Print exit code with rpm -vv (#195)

@n3npq Pro tip: You can preserve formatting of diffs by wrapping it in triple backticks and declaring format type, like so: ```diff --- foo +++ foo @@ -1 +1 @@ -bar +baz ``` Use ` ```diff ` before the first line, and use ` ``` ` after the last line. -- You are receiving this because you are

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Allow armsfp arches on armhfp ones (rhbz#1440974) (#199)

Note that technically you cannot mix armsfp with armhfp packages as they have different libc ABIs. I'm not sure if there is a better way to do this in RPM, though. As it is, though, at least the first commit in this PR is needed regardless, since it fixes the arch compatibility tree changes

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Allow armsfp arches on armhfp ones (rhbz#1440974) (#199)

It wouldn't necessarily matter one way or the other, as the system rpm is installing into the chroot, so it would be outside of the personality scope, wouldn't it? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Allow armsfp arches on armhfp ones (rhbz#1440974) (#199)

Also, the only reason they can't be mixed is because on most RPM systems, they share `/usr/lib`. If they were in a sysroot-style FHS or Debian-style FHS, that would not be the case. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Allow armsfp arches on armhfp ones (rhbz#1440974) (#199)

That's more in @xsuchy's domain. But as far as I know, mock uses `personality(2)` syscall to set target arch, and without the commit to declare compat, rpm bombs out saying that the packages are for a different architecture. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add macros to generate --enable-/disable- arguments (#176)

Not that I see anything particularly wrong with this, but, umm, why do you want this? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add macros to generate --enable-/disable- arguments (#176)

The with/without macros don't quite work the same way, as they don't assume autotools underneath. Your enable/disable macros do. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] debugedit.c patches (#171)

@n3npq For what it's worth, to make it all unformatted text, use ` ``` ` at the top of the block, and ` ``` ` at the bottom of the block. That way, it looks like patches or code. :) In addition, you can tell it to be diff style by doing ` ```diff ` for the top of the block. -- You are

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add support for ARM 64bit (aarch64) - Add arm32 and arm64 macros (#173)

We never needed anything because the x86_64 architecture never further mutated. Unless AArch64 also mutates like the 32-bit ARM architectures did, I don't see why we need `%arm64`. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >