James Olin wrote:
On 2/9/07, Stanislav Brabec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately though, I just realized I might be misled, because
there is no way that I know to deal with autogenerated deps in this
way.
You are true, but at least partially it is possible.
Yes, it is a overkill
Paul Nasrat wrote:
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 14:51 +0100, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
And finally, why %preuntrans and %postuntrans don't exist at all?
There is no such thing as an untransaction, we don't do different types
of transaction, merely a transaction that contains different operations
$RPMDIR
cat $RPMDIR/macros EOF
%_sourcedir $PWD
%_builddir $PWD/BUILD
EOF
cat $RPMDIR/rpmrc EOF
$(grep macrofiles /usr/lib/rpm/rpmrc):$RPMDIR/macros
EOF
eval rpmbuild --rcfile /usr/lib/rpm/rpmrc:$RPMDIR/rpmrc $@
--
Best Regards / S pozdravem,
Stanislav Brabec
software developer
PROTECTED]
--
Best Regards / S pozdravem,
Stanislav Brabec
software developer
-
SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 966, +49 911 740538747
190 00
Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 17:53 +0200, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
openSUSE use chroots inside Xen secured build hosts in Build Service.
Yes, I didn't mean to imply that you were vulnerable while Fedora is
not. Apologies if it came across like that.
I only wanted to agree
Pixel wrote:
Stanislav Brabec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Particular problems there may have different severity and different
complexity. The worst one seems to be Problems of Scriptlets / Database
rebuild.
mandriva is currently experimenting something on this subject:
http
it could be possible to write it as well, but only deep
inside the rpm (when rpm evaluates possible conflicts in forthcoming
transaction).
--
Best Regards / S pozdravem,
Stanislav Brabec
software developer
-
SUSE LINUX, s. r. o
--
Best Regards / S pozdravem,
Stanislav Brabec
software developer
-
SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 966, +49 911 740538747
190 00 Praha 9
Pixel wrote:
Stanislav Brabec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Using %preun is acceptable only for uninstallation, not for upgrade.
But this is yet another problem mentioned in the document, not related
to one-time-scriptlets.
oops, right. mandriva never went that far :)
http
Pixel wrote:
Stanislav Brabec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[[...]]
Texinfo:
openSUSE and Fedora do the same, but openSUSE defines macros %
install_info and %install_info_delete.
we have %_install_info %_remove_install_info
Actually used scriptlets are fragile and in some
-
--
Best Regards / S pozdravem,
Stanislav Brabec
software developer
-
SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 966, +49 911
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 17:09 +0200, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
Hallo.
%build
Packagers are encouraged to call autoreconf whenever possible. It
guarantees correct build of packages on platforms, that was not
supported by autotools
Mark Hatle wrote:
Stanislav Brabec wrote:
The standard %setup macro should unpack these packages in convenient
way:
%prep
%setup -q
Configuration and compilation
%build
Packagers are encouraged to call autoreconf whenever possible. It
guarantees correct build
of such issue, I would strongly
advice to never patch any auto-generated files.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravem,
Stanislav Brabec
software developer
-
SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lihovarská 1060/12
itself has no support for explicit -I and -L
redirection into sysroot.
Yes, particular programs provide a solution, but as it is program
specific, it cannot be used for general packaging rules.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravem,
Stanislav Brabec
software developer
=${samba_cv_SIZEOF_OFF_T=yes}
samba_cv_SIZEOF_INO_T=${samba_cv_SIZEOF_INO_T=yes}
samba_cv_HAVE_STRUCT_FLOCK64=${samba_cv_HAVE_STRUCT_FLOCK64=yes}
---
--
Best Regards / S pozdravem,
Stanislav Brabec
software developer
Mark Hatle wrote:
Stanislav Brabec wrote:
- And finally gcc itself has no support for explicit -I and -L
redirection into sysroot.
-L=...
That is a built in option that allows redirect into the sysroot
automatically. -L= is at least recognized by ld.
Our toolchains enable -I
://www.rpm.org/wiki/Problems
--
Best Regards / S pozdravem,
Stanislav Brabec
software developer
-
SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: sbra...@suse.cz
Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 966, +49 911
do what
you expect.
Sounds like a job for update-alternatives. If you don't want that,
use %verify(not md5 size mtime link) and don't use a scriptlet at
all.
Yes, update-alternatives is the cleanest solution in this case.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravem,
Stanislav Brabec
software developer
Michael Schroeder wrote in Thu 03/19 2009 at 16:49 +0100:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 04:32:27PM +0100, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
Michael Schroeder wrote in Thu 03/19 2009 at 15:35 +0100:
If it obsoletes another package it's an upgrade.
And what if the action you need is say foo-extra-update
Michael Schroeder wrote in Fri 03/20 2009 at 12:21 +0100:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 05:49:21PM +0100, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
Package smartsuite was renamed to smartmontools, but the
script /etc/init.d/smartd remains without change. Start on installation,
restart (once) on update, stop
?
--
Best Regards / S pozdravem,
Stanislav Brabec
software developer
-
SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: sbra...@suse.cz
Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 966, +49 911 740538747
190 00 Praha 9
:/Provides:/Supplements:/Recommends:/Conflicts:... to
another package dependencies (if it exists).
--
Best Regards / S pozdravem,
Stanislav Brabec
software developer
-
SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: sbra
.
People that updated before the rename, don't have libfoo-mybranch
installed any more.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravem,
Stanislav Brabec
software developer
-
SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: sbra...@suse.cz
24 matches
Mail list logo
