Responses inline below:
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
Second, you're right, I'm using rpm 4.8 from RHEL. It's the only choice I
have.
OK.
FYI: there's not enough difference to worry about between @rpm.org - @
rpm5.org.
The goals are more
On Jan 5, 2013, at 4:02 PM, Mykel Alvis wrote:
devzero2000 over on the rpm-users list suggested
%define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0
This did exactly what I needed.
Yes but … there are profound changes to the *.rpm package
format that are coupled to setting
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Mykel Alvis
mal...@restorationhardware.com wrote:
devzero2000 over on the rpm-users list suggested
%define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0
My self, devzero2000 (Elia Pinto) is part of the rpm5 team, thanks to
jeff. Since the request was for rpm 4.8 I
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
On Jan 5, 2013, at 4:02 PM, Mykel Alvis wrote:
devzero2000 over on the rpm-users list suggested
%define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0
This did exactly what I needed.
Yes but … there are profound changes to the
