Is it possible to rename the project maybe? I know you can have dots
in the name - e.g. http://github.com/thoughtworks/cruisecontrol.rb
though I think I may have heard this was a restriction that was lifted
relatively recently.
On 18 Sep 2008, at 20:42, Jay Levitt wrote:
Ben Mabey wrote:
Just installed this - superb!
Thanks Ben.
On 17 Sep 2008, at 19:42, Ben Mabey wrote:
Hey all,
I am in the process of porting my RSpec Story Textmate bundle over to
Cucumber.
So far I have the syntax highlighting, file switching, and running of
the features and single scenarios done. So not
Ben Mabey wrote:
Pat Maddox wrote:
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Also, what is your data? The matcher may not work as expected due to
nuances in your data. For
It is a bit ugly but here is an initial port of the Shoulda ActiveRecord
macros:
http://gist.github.com/14050
I did not try running ALL of the macros, but most of them. Before going
too far with it, I would appreciate some recommendations as to how to
improve the flow. The Shoulda version
Hi
The discussion among me, David, Michael, and Pat got me thinking.
Specifically this by Michael:
Just my $0.02, but I really like specs to be treated as
specifications for what SHOULD be happening, not pretending other
code is different than it is.
This made me think the real
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Neil Cauldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Mabey wrote:
Pat Maddox wrote:
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Also, what is your data? The
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Ashley Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RssReader when there is an HTTP error
- should attempt to parse the RSS
- should not attempt to parse the RSS
- should fail gracefully
From what I can see, your code error is not doing anything with the
caught exception:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Ashley Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
The discussion among me, David, Michael, and Pat got me thinking.
Specifically this by Michael:
Just my $0.02, but I really like specs to be treated as specifications for
what SHOULD be happening, not pretending other
On 1 Oct 2008, at 14:11, David Chelimsky wrote:
It's been a while since I've taken a look at it, but Luke Redpath has
a plugin called Demeter's Revenge
(http://plugins.code.lukeredpath.co.uk/browser/demeters_revenge/trunk)
that actually manages this all for you by adding methods like
On 1 Oct 2008, at 14:11, Mikel Lindsaar wrote:
Changing it to:
def rss
rss_body =
begin
@uri.read
::RSS::Parser.parse(rss_body, false)
rescue OpenURI::HTTPError = e
nil
end
end
Ah don't worry, that's what my real code does. The
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Neil Cauldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Also, what is your data? The matcher may not work as expected due to
describe handling GET /searches/people do
it should not include any inactive users in an assigned array of user
@results
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Ashley Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*does* pass the specs, both the one that says parse should be called, and
the one that say it shouldn't! But why? I'm prepared to admit I'm just
missing something really really really obvious (it happens often), but how
I updated the gist posting. All of the macros should be functional now
and have cleaned up describe blocks.
http://gist.github.com/14050
Andy Freeman wrote:
It is a bit ugly but here is an initial port of the Shoulda ActiveRecord
macros:
http://gist.github.com/14050
I did not try
Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
*does* pass the specs, both the one that says parse should be called,
and the one that say it shouldn't! But why? I'm prepared to admit
I'm just missing something really really really obvious (it happens
often), but how can:
it should attempt to
Neil Cauldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is my stubbing breaking this? I hope not because Thinking SPhinx isn't
determining the scope of the search in relation to the 'active' state of
the users; the search is built on top of a named scope on the User
model;
# GET /searches/people
#
On 1 Oct 2008, at 15:23, Pat Maddox wrote:
I think this may be a bug that I introduced recently. Fortunately I
also think someone already wrote a patch :) Check out
http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/5645/tickets/548 and see if it
solves your problem.
Aha! That's it.
That's a pretty
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 6:11 AM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
It's been a while since I've taken a look at it, but Luke Redpath has
a plugin called Demeter's Revenge
(http://plugins.code.lukeredpath.co.uk/browser/demeters_revenge/trunk)
that actually manages this all for you by
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:20 PM, aslak hellesoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Evan David Light
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject says most of it. I'd love to use Cucumber in my project but I
need
to be able to install it in a Rails app and by a particular version
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Chris Flipse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:20 PM, aslak hellesoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Evan David Light
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject says most of it. I'd love to use Cucumber in my project but I
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 11:20 AM, aslak hellesoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Chris Flipse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:20 PM, aslak hellesoy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Evan David Light
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 1 Oct 2008, at 15:23, Pat Maddox wrote:
I think this may be a bug that I introduced recently. Fortunately I
also think someone already wrote a patch :) Check out
http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/5645/tickets/548 and see if it
solves your
Matt Wynne wrote:
Is it possible to rename the project maybe? I know you can have dots
in the name - e.g. http://github.com/thoughtworks/cruisecontrol.rb
though I think I may have heard this was a restriction that was lifted
relatively recently.
I'll look into it. I named it that because
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Ben Mabey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Wynne wrote:
Is it possible to rename the project maybe? I know you can have dots in
the name - e.g. http://github.com/thoughtworks/cruisecontrol.rb though I
think I may have heard this was a restriction that was lifted
On Oct 1, 2008, at 11:53 AM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
No, actually - it's been me trying to convince the GitHub pixies to
build the gem. To no avail.
Not to belabor a point overly but hence my suggestion to put a gem on
RubyForge.
I'm dying for a stable version of Cucumber -- even if it's
On 1 Oct 2008, at 16:53, aslak hellesoy wrote:
No, actually - it's been me trying to convince the GitHub pixies to
build the gem. To no avail.
Have we witnessed the birth of Pixie Driven Development this week? I
feel like we need PixieSpec and Pixie Stories next :)
Ashley
--
Neil Cauldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pat Maddox wrote:
Neil Cauldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
respond_to do |format|
format.html
format.xml { render :xml = @results }
end
end
Cheers
You're stubbing User.search, but you don't actually call it. search
On Oct 1, 2008, at 12:09 PM, Ashley Moran wrote:
On 1 Oct 2008, at 16:53, aslak hellesoy wrote:
No, actually - it's been me trying to convince the GitHub pixies to
build the gem. To no avail.
Have we witnessed the birth of Pixie Driven Development this week?
I feel like we need
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Chris Flipse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 11:20 AM, aslak hellesoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Chris Flipse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:20 PM, aslak hellesoy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 1 Oct 2008, at 15:23, Pat Maddox wrote:
I think this may be a bug that I introduced recently. Fortunately I
also think someone already wrote a patch :) Check out
Ben Mabey wrote:
Matt Wynne wrote:
Is it possible to rename the project maybe? I know you can have dots
in the name - e.g. http://github.com/thoughtworks/cruisecontrol.rb
though I think I may have heard this was a restriction that was
lifted relatively recently.
I'll look into it. I named
The point is to never assume the structure of another object, but to
let it decide that. So you never get A.B.C you always use a method on
A to do the work. You get a lot more methods on A but the structure
underneath can change without a ripple effect. For example if you had
2
How about - can you somehow fork it to the new name, thereby keeping
the old things up and running but blazing a new and shiny train from
henceforth?
Otherwise, it's gotta be a no, hasn't it?
On 1 Oct 2008, at 19:12, Ben Mabey wrote:
Ben Mabey wrote:
Matt Wynne wrote:
Is it possible to
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Luis Lavena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Chris Flipse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 11:20 AM, aslak hellesoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Chris Flipse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Michael Latta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The point is to never assume the structure of another object, but to let it
decide that. So you never get A.B.C you always use a method on A to do the
work. You get a lot more methods on A but the structure underneath
Pat Maddox wrote:
Neil Cauldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(which it doesn't, therefore suggesting the spec is broken);
def do_get
ThinkingSphinx::Search.stub!(:search).and_return(users)
get :people, :search = bob
end
...so shouldn't the spec fail if we're returning all
On Oct 1, 2008, at 2:50 PM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
Does anyone want Cucumber gems? No? Yes? Anyone? OK I HEARD YOU! :-)
http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=797
Just chill till it rsyncs around. Install docs are updated:
http://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/wikis/home
Thank
Neil Cauldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pat Maddox wrote:
Neil Cauldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(which it doesn't, therefore suggesting the spec is broken);
def do_get
ThinkingSphinx::Search.stub!(:search).and_return(users)
get :people, :search = bob
end
...so
Pat Maddox wrote:
Neil Cauldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...so shouldn't the spec fail if we're returning all the users fixtures
which is true. [1,2,3] is not an element of the array [1,2,3]. I used
description);
results
...so I'm one step closer but I'm now a little confused by the
Neil Cauldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pat Maddox wrote:
Neil Cauldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...so shouldn't the spec fail if we're returning all the users fixtures
which is true. [1,2,3] is not an element of the array [1,2,3]. I used
description);
results
...so I'm one step
This could be intentional, but still surprising.
Say, we are using ActiveRecord session store, according to the setting
in environment.rb:
config.action_controller.session_store = :active_record_store
When controller writes 5000 bytes to the session:
session[:foo] = a * 5000
The application
On Oct 01, 2008, at 6:39 pm, David Chelimsky wrote:
There were a couple of other bugs introduced in 1.1.5 so I would like
to get out a 1.1.6 very soon. Probably over the weekend if we can get
them all fixed.
Cool thanks David.
It's not such an issue now I know how to work round it but it
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Ashley Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Oct 01, 2008, at 8:17 pm, Mark Wilden wrote:
Sounds like future-proofing to me. In the case of libraries, that can be a
good thing. For application code, it flies in the face of YAGNI.
Actually I don't think that's a
Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Oct 01, 2008, at 6:39 pm, David Chelimsky wrote:
There were a couple of other bugs introduced in 1.1.5 so I would like
to get out a 1.1.6 very soon. Probably over the weekend if we can get
them all fixed.
Cool thanks David.
It's not such an
On Oct 02, 2008, at 2:38 am, Mark Wilden wrote:
However, I say that there are too many things that need doing right
now - right this second - to waste time on what may or may not
happen in the future. Put another way, what are you willing to give
up in order to add this layer?
Perhaps
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Mark Wilden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Oct 01, 2008, at 8:17 pm, Mark Wilden wrote:
Sounds like future-proofing to me. In the case of libraries, that can be
a good thing. For application
On Oct 02, 2008, at 2:53 am, Pat Maddox wrote:
btw this is applied in trunk, so if you haven't applied the patch
yourself yet then you can just update to the latest code and you're
set.
Cool thanks for the info Pat
Ashley
--
http://www.patchspace.co.uk/
http://aviewfromafar.net/
Hi all
Just ran a session known as a huddle in GeekUp terms. GeekUp[1] is
a group of monthly events in North West England. The Sheffield one
starts with a huddle every month, which is intended to have more
audience participation than a pure talk. For this one, I got an
unsuspecting
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Ashley Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
Just ran a session known as a huddle in GeekUp terms. GeekUp[1] is a
group of monthly events in North West England. The Sheffield one starts
with a huddle every month, which is intended to have more audience
48 matches
Mail list logo
