Hi Greg
My approach with Monit and sessions was to create a specific
controller action to poll, and turn sessions off for it.
http://pastie.textmate.org/188359
It does feel like overkill, mind you, and I'm a little surprised that
calling a static file (which is a more elegant solution)
Hi Raul
Since Sphinx talks directly to MySQL, it's definitely best to have it
on the same server. Theplugins will be able to talk to a remote server
(provided the port isn't blocked), so you should be fine with just the
one Sphinx daemon.
That said, if it does prove to be a bottleneck
On 10/04/2008, at 7:48 PM, Adhiraj Rankhambe wrote:
2. It's Java - which is extra overhead for some people - I certainly
don't use any other Java tools, and I've not dealt with Java since
Uni. Again, each to their own, but that may push non-Java people away
from Solr.
You don't need to know
On 03/04/2008, at 4:55 PM, Adhiraj Rankhambe wrote:
Sphinx:-
Advantages:-
1. Great at speed of indexing and searching.
2. Its at the database level so just one copy of indexes unlike
ferret.
Disadvantages:-
1. Difficult to integrate as compared to Ferret or Solr.
Arguable, but each to
On 10/02/2008, at 3:27 PM, Dave Amos wrote:
Shawn Balestracci wrote:
The database is stored in its own file (named in your database.yml)
To access it, on the commandline:
sqlite3 filename
on the server and directory where it is located (or use the full
path). The database will most
On 1/29/2008, Peter Vandenabeele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jeff Cc wrote:
- No wildcards at all (Sphinx doesn't support them)
Do you mean the * feature (prefix* and *infix*) ? Where
the search term program* matches the database text
program, programmer, programs ...
Those work for me in
On 19/01/2008, at 10:17 AM, Jeff wrote:
How difficult would it be to change over to Sphinx?
The overall process? Not hard, with the caveat Adrian mentioned (ie:
advanced Ferret features).
But keep in mind Sphinx does not allow updating fields of index
records (Ferret does) - you have to
