[sage-devel] Re: sage/symbolic _forget_all and maxima

2010-01-19 Thread Nils Bruin
On Jan 18, 11:27 pm, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote: I'm not familiar with the maxima interface, but the comment by Robert Dodier reproduced here http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7507 seems to suggest we need to call remove() in some cases. Thanks! very relevant indeed.

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.3.1.rc1 released!

2010-01-19 Thread Robert Miller
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/sage-4.3.1.rc1.tar Oops: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.3.1.rc1.tar -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.3.1.rc1 released!

2010-01-19 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Robert Miller rlmills...@gmail.com wrote: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/sage-4.3.1.rc1.tar Oops: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.3.1.rc1.tar Also, note that you *must* do chmod +x spkg/install make test

[sage-devel] Re: A new problem on Solaris 10 SPARC has emerged.

2010-01-19 Thread Dr David Kirkby
On Jan 19, 5:39 am, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote: So the error seems to be coming from this command: building 'sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.descent_two_isogeny' extension /usr/local/gcc-4.4.1-sun-linker/bin/gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.3.1.rc1 released!

2010-01-19 Thread Dima Pasechnik
is it possible to make patches, instead/as well as posting full source releases? It took 4+ hours here to download rc0... On Jan 19, 4:29 pm, Robert Miller rlmills...@gmail.com wrote: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/sage-4.3.1.rc1.tar

Re: [sage-devel] problem with elliptic curves

2010-01-19 Thread John Cremona
If someone is looking into that please say so on the ticket, otherwise I'll look at it today (GMT). John 2010/1/19 William Stein wst...@gmail.com: On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:59 PM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote: Ticket #7532 deals with this issue: in ring.pyx, code says return

Re: [sage-devel] problem with elliptic curves

2010-01-19 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:16 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote: If someone is looking into that please say so on the ticket, otherwise I'll look at it today (GMT). John -- go for it; none of us are doing it! John 2010/1/19 William Stein wst...@gmail.com: On Mon, Jan 18, 2010

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.3.1.rc1 released!

2010-01-19 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
Dima Pasechnik wrote: is it possible to make patches, instead/as well as posting full source releases? It took 4+ hours here to download rc0... One thing one could try out is to play with rsync over SSH to an account on boxen.math. rsync the rc1 file with a local copy of the rc0 tarball,

Re: [sage-devel] problem with elliptic curves

2010-01-19 Thread John Cremona
2010/1/19 William Stein wst...@gmail.com: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:16 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote: If someone is looking into that please say so on the ticket, otherwise I'll look at it today (GMT). John -- go for it; none of us are doing it! OK. I just did #7992 too.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.3.1.rc1 released!

2010-01-19 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn da...@student.matnat.uio.no wrote: Dima Pasechnik wrote: is it possible to make patches, instead/as well as posting full source releases? It took 4+ hours here to download rc0... We have a standard system for doing upgrades from say rc0

[sage-devel] Re: 1; in ipython

2010-01-19 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Fernando Perez fernando.pe...@berkeley.edu wrote: Hi William, On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:52 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: SO, now I think this is a bug in *IPython*, not the sage notebook. What do you think? It's by design: one of the few

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.3.1.rc1 released!

2010-01-19 Thread Dima Pasechnik
hmm, is running diff -r DIR1 DIR2 patch1 and putting patch1 up for download so hard to do? Surely, a better way might be having the whole thing under a revision control system allowing (semi)anonymous pulls, than pulling an upgrade is trivial... (well, I would be mighty surpised learning Sage

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.3.1.rc1 released!

2010-01-19 Thread Mike Hansen
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote: hmm, is running   diff -r DIR1 DIR2 patch1 and putting patch1 up for download so hard to do? Surely, a better way might be having the whole thing under a revision control system allowing (semi)anonymous pulls, than

[sage-devel] Re: Not the best week for the Solaris port.

2010-01-19 Thread Dr David Kirkby
On Jan 19, 1:50 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Dr. David Kirkby I should have made it clearer, that it will need to be: CFLAGS=$SAGE_COMMON_CFLAGS CXXFLAGS=$SAGE_COMMON_CXXFLAGS FCFLAGS=$SAGE_COMMON_FCFLAGS since the options may be

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.3.1.rc1 released!

2010-01-19 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 2:49 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: We have a standard system for doing upgrades from say rc0 to rc1, etc, which we usually use in such cases. However, Robert Miller was *super tired* and

[sage-devel] Re: Not the best week for the Solaris port.

2010-01-19 Thread Jaap Spies
Dr David Kirkby wrote: From what I have read of the GNU linker documentation on the linker 'ld' http://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.20/ld/Options.html#Options there is no such flag as -m64. So I can't understand how it works. (There is an opton -64 on the Sun linker, but it rarely

[sage-devel] Re: new GAP spkg?

2010-01-19 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Hi Minh, first I need instructions on how to patch a standard package (i.e. gap-4.4.10). Say, I have made gap-blah.spkg and I want to replace the standard package with it. When I read the development guide I only see that I should post by gap- blah.spkg somewhere and let people test it. That's not

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.3.1.rc1 released!

2010-01-19 Thread John Cremona
4.3.1.rc1 built fine (64-bit ubuntu), one test failure: sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/sagedoc.py ** File /home/jec/sage-4.3.1.rc1/devel/sage-main/sage/misc/sagedoc.py, line 365: sage: 'abvar/homology' in

[sage-devel] Re: How to debug a mysterious error ?

2010-01-19 Thread slabbe
Can you try sage -t -verbose? Great. It worked. It was a syntax error in a doctest : a line ...: after a one-liner while. Thanks to both of you for the quick answer. Sébastien -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an

[sage-devel] SyntaxError when loading Sage 4.3.1.rc1 due to non-ASCII character

2010-01-19 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi folks, I built Sage 4.3.1.rc1 from source and then produced a sage.math binary (you can find it at [1]). Loading the binary resulted in the following SyntaxError: SyntaxError: Non-ASCII character '\xc3' in file

Re: [sage-devel] SyntaxError when loading Sage 4.3.1.rc1 due to non-ASCII character

2010-01-19 Thread John Cremona
That's funny, I can run my 4.3.1.rc1 built from source with no problem. On that accent, I would have just deleted the accent. There are two other reference to that journal: sage: search_src(Ast) schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py:5447: modular forms. Astérisque, (295):ix,

Re: [sage-devel] SyntaxError when loading Sage 4.3.1.rc1 due to non-ASCII character

2010-01-19 Thread John Cremona
2010/1/19 John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com: That's funny, I can run my 4.3.1.rc1 built from source with no problem. On that accent, I would have just deleted the accent.  There are two other reference to that journal: sage: search_src(Ast)

Re: [sage-devel] update copyright years to span 2005--2010

2010-01-19 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi David, On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: SNIP Is this really necessary? I don't know. Is it updated because you believe it is legally necessary to do so, or because it looks better? I think it looks better. I'm following what the Python

Re: [sage-devel] SyntaxError when loading Sage 4.3.1.rc1 due to non-ASCII character

2010-01-19 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi John, On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 3:25 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/1/19 John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com: That's funny, I can run my 4.3.1.rc1 built from source with no problem. SNIP Someone else had better review this since I don't get the error On first

Re: [sage-devel] update copyright years to span 2005--2010

2010-01-19 Thread Christopher Olah
I'm not a lawyer, nor do I live in the USA, I'm not a lawyer either, and don't live in the US. I do know a little bit about copyright, though. but at least in the UK, if you write something you automatically get copyright, though it does no harm to make a specific statement. Copyright

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.3.1.rc1 released!

2010-01-19 Thread John Cremona
2010/1/19 John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com: 4.3.1.rc1 built fine (64-bit ubuntu), one test failure: sage -t  devel/sage/sage/misc/sagedoc.py ** File /home/jec/sage-4.3.1.rc1/devel/sage-main/sage/misc/sagedoc.py, line

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.3.1.rc1 released!

2010-01-19 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi John, On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 4:42 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote: SNIP And on another 64-bit ubuntu machine, built fine and two failures -- the one above and also this: j...@host-57-44%./sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/sage0.py This failure might be related to the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.3.1.rc1 released!

2010-01-19 Thread Alex Ghitza
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:02:55 +, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote: 4.3.1.rc1 built fine (64-bit ubuntu), one test failure: sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/sagedoc.py ** File

Re: [sage-devel] spam content has got through to the Sage wiki

2010-01-19 Thread David Kirkby
2010/1/16 Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com: Hi folks, A spammer using the wiki username KristyMontero recently deleted everything on the development wiki page [1]. In its place, the spammer placed a link to an external site. To see the effect of the spammer's work, go to the development

[sage-devel] Please advertise summer Sage Workshop through MAA!

2010-01-19 Thread kcrisman
Dear all, Both these lists will be interested in the upcoming online Sage PREP (Professional Enhancement Program), funded by the MAA via NSF DUE-0817071. See http://www.maa.org/prep/2010/sage.html for more information; please advertise it to those you might think are interested. Our hope is to

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.3.1.rc1 released!

2010-01-19 Thread John H Palmieri
On Jan 19, 7:02 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote: 4.3.1.rc1 built fine (64-bit ubuntu), one test failure: sage -t  devel/sage/sage/misc/sagedoc.py ** File

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.3.1.rc1 released!

2010-01-19 Thread Robert Miller
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote: Sage-4.3.1.rc1 has been released. I have fixed the tarball so you don't need to change permissions to build: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/sage-4.3.1.rc1.tar You will likely need to apply the patch at #7999

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.3.1.rc1 released!

2010-01-19 Thread John Cremona
2010/1/19 Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com: Hi John, On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 4:42 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote: SNIP And on another 64-bit ubuntu machine, built fine and two failures -- the one above and also this: j...@host-57-44%./sage -t  

Re: [sage-devel] Re: new GAP spkg?

2010-01-19 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Dmitrii, On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Minh, first I need instructions on how to patch a standard package (i.e. gap-4.4.10). I have written up some instructions on how to patch an spkg. The instructions are provided as an answer to the

[sage-devel] TOO LONG!

2010-01-19 Thread Robert Miller
It's time to point our fingers at long doctests again. (I won't name names, but there are a few people who are mostly responsible for several of these files) Here are the eight files whose doctests (without -long) take the longest: devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py

[sage-devel] Re: TOO LONG!

2010-01-19 Thread Robert Miller
PS - sorry for shouting in the subject :) On Jan 19, 1:54 pm, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote: It's time to point our fingers at long doctests again. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to

Re: [sage-devel] TOO LONG!

2010-01-19 Thread David Joyner
I am one of them, sorry! I'll try to look at this went I get some time. I'm teaching a new course this semester which is taking a lot of prep... http://www.usna.edu/Users/math/wdj/teach/sm450.html On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote: It's time to point our

[sage-devel] Instructions to build a Sage LiveDVD.

2010-01-19 Thread Lucio Lastra
Hi all, attached are the instructions and code to build a Sage LiveDVD based on Xubuntu 9.10. Once you uncompress the file you will find a folder with two files: README and codeToBuildIso which are plain text ones. Follow the instructions and you're done. Enjoy! -- To post to this group, send

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.3.1.rc1 released!

2010-01-19 Thread Gonzalo Tornaria
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn da...@student.matnat.uio.no wrote: Dima Pasechnik wrote: is it possible to make patches, instead/as well as posting full source releases? It took 4+ hours here to download rc0... One thing one could try out is to play with rsync over

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.3.1.rc1 released!

2010-01-19 Thread Robert Miller
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote: Sage-4.3.1.rc1 has been released. Note on the binaries! The binary posted yesterday was for sage.math only! The other three machines have a

[sage-devel] sagemath.org, etc.

2010-01-19 Thread William Stein
Hi, There will be at least 4 hours or more of downtime for the wiki's, sagemath site, etc. This is because somebody decided to start the sagemath virtualmachine at the same time as it was already started, thus mounting the disk twice. Not good. -- William -- William Stein Associate

[sage-devel] echelon_form calculated over the fraction field

2010-01-19 Thread Jason Grout
This is dredging up from the past an issue that will hopefully soon be resolved. Ticket #3211 recounts the issue. In summary, if M is an integer matrix, M.echelon_form() (and M.echelonize()) returns the echelon form over ZZ (i.e., the Hermite form). This is modeled after Magma, I believe.

[sage-devel] -fPIC in PARI and SELinux

2010-01-19 Thread Jonathan Bober
The Sage README.txt contains the text: On Linux, if you get this error message: restore segment prot after reloc: Permission denied the problem is probably related to SELinux. I got this error on a machine on which I don't have root access, so I couldn't try the suggested workarounds.

Re: [sage-devel] TOO LONG!

2010-01-19 Thread Alex Ghitza
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:54:57 -0800, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote: And here are the eight longest -long doctests: devel/sage-main/sage/rings/arith.py 506.284008026 Where was this run? I find it very strange, because #7678 recently arranged things so that arith.py runs quite a bit

[sage-devel] Re: echelon_form calculated over the fraction field

2010-01-19 Thread Rob Beezer
First - thanks, Jason, for taking this on. I think the rref approach makes a lot of sense for a change this big, and will be really useful for educational settings moving away from calculators (like me this term!). If we then want to replace instances of echelon_form, it can happen at its own

[sage-devel] sagemath virtual machine

2010-01-19 Thread William Stein
Hi, Somehow all the virtual machines were corrupted due to a surprising bug in VirtualBox. Fortunately, I made some sort of backup of them all about 1 week ago. 1. I've restored sagemath from this backup. Unfortunately, there are problems with some of the other virtual machines in the build

[sage-devel] Re: -fPIC in PARI and SELinux

2010-01-19 Thread Roman Pearce
On Jan 19, 7:21 pm, Jonathan Bober jwbo...@gmail.com wrote: Should PARI always be compiled with -fPIC? (Should I really be asking this question to PARI developers who decided not to use PIC?) I don't know much about this, but apparently -fPIC might cause some slowdown on some systems. It seems

Re: [sage-devel] Re: How to debug a mysterious error ?

2010-01-19 Thread Willem Jan Palenstijn
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 07:29:33AM -0800, slabbe wrote: Can you try sage -t -verbose? Great. It worked. It was a syntax error in a doctest : a line ...: after a one-liner while. I've just submitted patches to tickets #7995 and #7993 that (among other things) change the error given in this

Re: [sage-devel] Re: new GAP spkg?

2010-01-19 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Dmitrii, On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote: SNIP I have written up some instructions on how to patch an spkg. The instructions are provided as an answer to the question, How do I patch an spkg? in the Development FAQ:

Re: [sage-devel] -fPIC in PARI and SELinux

2010-01-19 Thread François Bissey
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:21:55 Jonathan Bober wrote: The Sage README.txt contains the text: On Linux, if you get this error message: restore segment prot after reloc: Permission denied the problem is probably related to SELinux. I got this error on a machine on which I don't have

Re: [sage-devel] -fPIC in PARI and SELinux

2010-01-19 Thread Minh Nguyen
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 5:44 PM, François Bissey f.r.bis...@massey.ac.nz wrote: I don't remember what the equivalent is for solaris and so on. See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7818 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/7818/sage-env -- Regards Minh Van Nguyen --