Re: [sage-support] Development process

For the purposes of reviewing you do not care about history being clean in your local branches, and what I describe does not lead to much recompilation. Whereas in particular with old tickets, with branches based on old versions of Sage, in your approach sometimes one would need to rebuild

Re: [sage-support] Development process

On 2016-12-06 22:02, Justin C. Walker wrote: > I am starting in a new, empty directory, and 'git' seems to want a repository > specified. > > I have a "global" .gitconfig file set up. > > A couple of questions: > > Should I check out the 'develop' branch first, and then incorporate (how?) >

Re: [sage-support] Re: Something like Mathematica's `Interact`?

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Joshua Marshall Moore wrote: > I've downloaded sagemath specifically so I could play with interact. > Unfortunately, none of the example seem to work in SageMath 7.4, I wrote Sage's interact somewhat inspired by Mathematica's

[sage-support] Re: Something like Mathematica's `Interact`?

I've downloaded sagemath specifically so I could play with interact. Unfortunately, none of the example seem to work in SageMath 7.4, and the documentation appears completely missing. Would someone mind explaining how interact is intended to be used? Also, I'm a Software Engineer, and could

[sage-support] Re: sage-7.4-Ubuntu_15.10-x86_64.tar.bz2 crashes

Fixed, but not in a stable release. Either use the 7.3 binary for now or compile from source. On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 12:57:36 AM UTC+1, Matthias Goerner wrote: > > I just tried to run sage-7.4-Ubuntu_15.10-x86_64.tar.bz2 but it crashes > with SIGILL (also attached CPU info): > >

[sage-support] sage-7.4-Ubuntu_15.10-x86_64.tar.bz2 crashes

I just tried to run sage-7.4-Ubuntu_15.10-x86_64.tar.bz2 but it crashes with SIGILL (also attached CPU info): ┌┐ │ SageMath version 7.4, Release Date: 2016-10-18 │ │ Type "notebook()" for the browser-based

Re: [sage-support] Re: Development process

On Dec 6, 2016, at 14:36 , Dima Pasechnik wrote: > I'll comment on how to use plain git > http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/manual_git.html#git-the-hard-way > > On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 9:03:46 PM UTC, Justin C. Walker wrote: >> >> Hi, all, >> >> I have not done any real Sage

[sage-support] Re: Development process

I'll comment on how to use plain git http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/manual_git.html#git-the-hard-way On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 9:03:46 PM UTC, Justin C. Walker wrote: > > Hi, all, > > I have not done any real Sage development for a while (the last time, I > think, there were

[sage-support] Re: Development process

On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 1:41:22 PM UTC-8, Nils Bruin wrote: > > On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 1:03:46 PM UTC-8, Justin C. Walker wrote: >> >> Hi, all, >> >> I have not done any real Sage development for a while (the last time, I >> think, there were wolves in Wales). >> >> I want to

[sage-support] Re: Has not installed properly, crashes

On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 5:19:11 PM UTC, Adam - wrote: > > The binaries (sage-7.4-Ubuntu_16.04-x86_64.tar.bz2) seemed to unpack ok > (on Ubuntu 16.04), but the command "sage", crashes. > > The crash report has right at the end of the report, "ImportError: > libgfortran.so.3: cannot open

[sage-support] Re: Development process

On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 1:03:46 PM UTC-8, Justin C. Walker wrote: > > Hi, all, > > I have not done any real Sage development for a while (the last time, I > think, there were wolves in Wales). > > I want to work on an existing Trac ticket, and I'm not clear on how to > start this work.

Re: [sage-support] Development process

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote: > Hi, all, > > I have not done any real Sage development for a while (the last time, I > think, there were wolves in Wales). > Same... and equally interested in the answer :-) > > I want to work on an existing Trac

[sage-support] Development process

Hi, all, I have not done any real Sage development for a while (the last time, I think, there were wolves in Wales). I want to work on an existing Trac ticket, and I'm not clear on how to start this work. The ticket page gives me a branch (u/blah/branch-name). I am starting in a new, empty

Re: [sage-support] Grobner basis for linear codes

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:21 PM, NITIN DARKUNDE wrote: > Respected Sir, > Yes sir, I am supposed to calculate Grobner basis for an > ideal in a polynomial ring in 35 variables with coefficients from GF(2). > Why don't you try it first using a code of

Re: [sage-support] Grobner basis for linear codes

Respected Sir, Yes sir, I am supposed to calculate Grobner basis for an ideal in a polynomial ring in 35 variables with coefficients from GF(2). On Dec 6, 2016 10:45 PM, "David Joyner" wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:56 AM, NITIN DARKUNDE

[sage-support] Has not installed properly, crashes

The binaries (sage-7.4-Ubuntu_16.04-x86_64.tar.bz2) seemed to unpack ok (on Ubuntu 16.04), but the command "sage", crashes. The crash report has right at the end of the report, "ImportError: libgfortran.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory ". (Presumably the

Re: [sage-support] Grobner basis for linear codes

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:56 AM, NITIN DARKUNDE wrote: > Dear group members, > I am doing my research in algebraic coding theory. I have > started using sage for computations of Grobner bases, but while doing it I > have some difficulties.The paper I am