There is Explosion emulator at NVG (it does Spectrum on Sam).
There are also lots of games for this emulator. Does anybody checked that
there aren't any of the Codemsters, US Gold, Ultimate and other explicitly
forbidden titles?
--
Gavin Smith wrote:
This is probably a good time to ask people's opinions on including
Speccy games that have been made to run on a SAM, on samcoupe.org -
my opinion is that they are still Speccy games and they should
initially be left out. What do others think?
IMO something that's been
, 2005 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: Spectrum on Sam games at NVG
This is probably a good time to ask people's opinions on including Speccy
games
that have been made to run on a SAM, on samcoupe.org - my opinion is that
they
are still Speccy games and they should initially be left out. What do
others
Gavin Smith wrote:
This is probably a good time to ask people's opinions on including Speccy games
that have been made to run on a SAM, on samcoupe.org - my opinion is that they
are still Speccy games and they should initially be left out. What do others
think?
I think that any game/demos
We had a good talk about it and everyboday can have a look at
http://www.mail-archive.com/sam-users%40nvg.ntnu.no/
Theme: Let's
discuss ZX Spectrum games
Wolfgang
Gavin Smith wrote:
This is probably a good time to ask people's opinions on including Speccy games
that have been made to
Aley Keprt wrote:
At first it obvious that any standard 48k games which don't
need any changes to run on Sam should be removed.
Agreed.
But I think that 128k, AY and tape-disk converted games
should stay.
They have always been a part of the SAM scene, so it does feel like they
belong in
But I think that 128k, AY and tape-disk converted games
should stay.
They have always been a part of the SAM scene, so it does feel like they
belong in the archive. I'd still be tempted to keep them in a different
category from native SAM software, to make sure people are aware they're
still
Aley Keprt wrote:
But I think that 128k, AY and tape-disk converted games
should stay.
They have always been a part of the SAM scene, so it does feel like they
belong in the archive. I'd still be tempted to keep them in a different
category from native SAM software, to make sure people are
Sorry, you're right, I've a memory like a sieve these days - the general consensus seems to be to include them if they're in any way modified to work on the SAM, but to include them in a seperate section. Sounds good to me.
Cheers,
Gavin
On 20 Jan 2005, at 3:09 pm, Wolfgang Haller wrote:
We had
