On 05/04/2012 06:57, nev young wrote:
On 04/04/12 23:39, da...@properbastard.co.uk wrote:
Was it just me who was sent a huge number of un-requested files?
I've added the sender to my email blacklist.
* WOOT *
My R* J* spam filter works!
Two attempts at indirect contact via 3rd
Am 11.04.2012 23:18, schrieb Wayne Weedon:
On 05/04/2012 06:57, nev young wrote:
On 04/04/12 23:39, da...@properbastard.co.uk wrote:
Was it just me who was sent a huge number of un-requested files?
I've added the sender to my email blacklist.
* WOOT *
My R* J* spam filter works!
Jumping in a bit late here, but the results are absolutely stunning!
I had an attempt at reading the source on github, but my Z80 has gone a bit
rusty. :-)
Is the palette being adjusted multiple times while the line is being drawn
(similar to the rainbow processor effects on the Spectrum) or is
I expect approximately +25% speed gain in uncontended memory.
And Simon Owen wrote that he changes palette only “between” lines.
Aley
From: Stefan Drissen
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 11:42 PM
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Subject: Re: SAM HAM viewer
Jumping in a bit late here, but the
On 11 Apr 2012, at 22:42, Stefan Drissen wrote:
Jumping in a bit late here, but the results are absolutely stunning!
I had an attempt at reading the source on github, but my Z80 has gone a bit
rusty. :-)
Is the palette being adjusted multiple times while the line is being drawn
Yes messages today and still more coming in right now. Behold...
Okay so my real genuine opinion is that he may be autistic. And as such I'm
just going to block everything that comes along. I'm not even considering
educating him or having an argument.
Anyway, being a bit positive here, you
Interesting note: Balor followed me on Twitter. Roger followed me the very
next day. Could be a coincidence and he could just be moving down the list,
but the email address that I use for that service is not the same one I use on
this list..
I got the spam filter spam today like the rest of
Interesting, I need 50% (1 sample burst per scan line instead of 1 sample burst
per 1.5 scan lines), so that would leave 25% lacking. On the other hand,
bursting per scan line would get rid of the manual timing to get burst at half
lines. To be continued.
Got the between, thanks – rereading
