Hi Andrew,
many thanks for you patch,
i tested it on 2 different systems but without success (the crash is always
happening).
before applying the patch, I had a strange problem : I couldn't reproduce the
problem (with wbinfo --uid-info 300)
on one of the machine. no chance even if I
Hi everyone,
What I want to achieve is to provision a new domain with the users, groups and
group policy of an existing AD domain. Is this what I would use the vampire
function for? Am I on the wrong track?
Alex Ferrara
Director
Receptive IT Solutions
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to
Hi Samba users
using samba 4.0.6, having /etc/nsswitch.conf that use winbind,
getent group does not display the group members.
to reproduce that : (my domain is test3.ch)
samba-tool user add u1
samba-tool group add g1
samba-tool group addmembers g1 u1
id u1 returns :
uid=326(TEST3\u1)
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 05:58 +, philippe.simo...@swisscom.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
many thanks for you patch,
i tested it on 2 different systems but without success (the crash is always
happening).
before applying the patch, I had a strange problem : I couldn't reproduce
the problem
Hi Andrew,
sorry (my English...) I was not clear. I tried to say that the patch does not
change anything for me,
the crash is still here.
best regards
Philippe
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 9:18 AM
To: Simonet
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 06:23 +, philippe.simo...@swisscom.com wrote:
Hi Samba users
but getent group does not return group/user membership :
TEST3\g1:*:327:
any advices ?
It doesn't work for groups:(
use:
getent group TEST\g1
hth
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 07:23 +, philippe.simo...@swisscom.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
sorry (my English...) I was not clear. I tried to say that the patch does not
change anything for me,
the crash is still here.
Which (named) patch did you try?
I've attached both patches which I proposed.
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 10:26 +0200, Philipp Lies wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get my new samba server running for a few days now and I
start losing my mind over not figuring out what I'm doing wrong. Here's
my setup:
OpenLDAP 2.4.21 server with ~15 groups and 100 users, all having a unix
and
I tried both, and I get still crashes :
0001-gensec-work-around-nested-event-loops-by-ensuring-th.patch
0002-s4-winbind-Add-special-case-for-BUILTIN-domain.patch
-
samba version 4.0.6 started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2012
samba: using 'single' process model
For me the better way would be, to run serveral openldap servers in master
master replication on your
DC and several BDC. And no headache about anything.
Or just point your BSCs to authenticate against the DCs openldap. But when
your DC is down your authentication is gone.
Greetings
Daniel
Hi Steve
getent group TEST3\g1 give an empty result, and getent group TEST3\\g1 with
the same result as getent group g1, without user/group membership.
in fact my problem goes further : shares access control (write list, ...) does
not work for @g1, only with u1 ...
Philippe
-Original
Hi, well yet another reason to use sssd instead of winbind. When I turned
on winbind in /etc/nsswitch.conf on my test S4 server, I get:
id user
uid=3001106(HOME\user) gid=20513(HOME\Domain Users)
groups=20513(HOME\Domain Users),21110(HOME\linuxusers)
getent group linuxusers
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 08:36 +, philippe.simo...@swisscom.com wrote:
Hi Steve
getent group TEST3\g1 give an empty result, and getent group TEST3\\g1
with the same result as getent group g1, without user/group membership.
in fact my problem goes further : shares access control (write
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 10:12 +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
Hi, well yet another reason to use sssd instead of winbind. When I
turned on winbind in /etc/nsswitch.conf on my test S4 server,
Also I would suggest forgetting using @group in smb.conf and use ACL's
instead.
Didn't see this, but
Hello Alex,
Am 21.06.2013 08:22, schrieb Alex Ferrara:
What I want to achieve is to provision a new domain with the users,
groups and group policy of an existing AD domain. Is this what
I would use the vampire function for? Am I on the wrong track?
First you setup a new Samba DC, according
No it is not working! My domain is named example.com and windows 8 is not
able to join this domain.
My other domain named test windows 8 can join without any problem.
It seems dotted domains old style are lost for ever.
---
EDV Daniel Müller
Leitung
On Friday, June 21, 2013 10:12:26 AM Rowland Penny wrote:
Hi, well yet another reason to use sssd instead of winbind.
[...]
Hi,
An other option is to use samba AD in one server and the file server (smbd +
winbindd) in an other. Since I've done that (last year I think) I've got no
problem at
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 15:39 +0200, Ali Bendriss wrote:
On Friday, June 21, 2013 10:12:26 AM Rowland Penny wrote:
Hi, well yet another reason to use sssd instead of winbind.
[...]
Hi,
An other option is to use samba AD in one server and the file server (smbd +
winbindd) in an other.
Dear List,
I am used to Samba 3 and LDAP. But since Samba 4 I'm struggeling hard to
understand what has to be done and how a possible solution might look like for
our scenario. I already found out that Samba 4 comes with its own LDAP Server
and if I want to use a slapd on the same system, it
Hello Marcus,
Am 21.06.2013 17:27, schrieb Marcus Mundt:
Environtment:
- LDAP-Master-Server with all the information needed
- mostly Windows XP and Windows 7 Clients
They should auto mount network drives after login (user, pass and rights from
LDAP-Master)
Here is what I want to achieve:
A
Hello,
I have a very odd issue happening, that I hope someone else might be
able to give me pointers.
I have two different networks running in two different locations,
connected by a network vpn.
In each network I have a test smb virtual machine.
-
Smb Machine 1: (smbtest1) (remote
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 03:03:33PM -0400, Terre Porter wrote:
socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=65536
SO_SNDBUF=65536
Not to comment on any other thing in your post
bue please remove this line from your smb.conf.
It's voodoo bullshit from the long-ancient past :-).
Upgrading Debian testing's linux-image from 3.2.46-1 to 3.9.6-1 causes
cifs mounts via fstab or command line to fail with return code -38
function not implemented. Reverting back to the old kernel yields
working cifs mounts. The only option I use is a credentials file.
Attempting the mount
Hi,
On the mac, connected to the remote (smbtest1) machine, when I double
click on the finder to enter the test directory that has about 200 files
in it, the finder just sits there... for at least two or more minuets
before showing anything.
I tried to connect to the smbtest1 machine
Thanks for the recommendations! I was hoping that there'd be a simple
solution/config parameter to force the samba server trust the LDAP (it's
still puzzling me why the other machines I have do work like that).
I'll try to set up my new servers as DCs and see how this goes. The idea
with
Hi Marc, comments below.
On 6/20/2013 5:26 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
Hello David,
Am 20.06.2013 19:55, schrieb David González Herrera - [DGHVoIP]:
I would like youi to point me or tell me how do I create a fail-over or
high availability system so that when one of the DCs is down the other
On 6/21/2013 3:44 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 03:03:33PM -0400, Terre Porter wrote:
socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=65536
SO_SNDBUF=65536
Not to comment on any other thing in your post
bue please remove this line from your smb.conf.
It's
On 6/21/2013 4:24 PM, Bob Miller wrote:
Hi,
On the mac, connected to the remote (smbtest1) machine, when I double
click on the finder to enter the test directory that has about 200 files
in it, the finder just sits there... for at least two or more minuets
before showing anything.
I tried to
On 13/06/13 12:37 AM, Julien Savoie wrote:
On 21/08/12 11:46 AM, John Drescher wrote:
I have a samba domain with over 100 machines in it. For some reason every
30-35
days, 2 of the machines fail the trust relationship at login and need to be
removed from the domain and rejoined.
In the logs
Hello David,
Am 21.06.2013 23:42, schrieb David González Herrera - [DGHVoIP]:
root@bdc:~# dig @10.10.10.20 AXFR example.local
.
example.local. 900 IN A 10.10.10.5
example.local. 900 IN A 21x.xxx.xxx.xxx
example.local. 900 IN A
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated
via 4b25860 docs: Avoid mentioning a possibly misleading option.
from a46a6be tevent: Fix Coverity ID 989236 Operands don't affect result
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v4-0-test
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via ad86e2a s3:passdb/pdb_util make pdb_create_builtin consider whether
backend deals with BUILTIN
via 2d2d13e s3:passdb add a gid argument to pdb_create_builtin_alias
via 212baed s3:utils/net_sam make use of pdb_create_builtin helper
The branch, master has been updated
via d2642cb dns: Fix CID 1034969 Uninitialized scalar variable
from ad86e2a s3:passdb/pdb_util make pdb_create_builtin consider whether
backend deals with BUILTIN
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via b96cea4 Fix some blank line endings
from d2642cb dns: Fix CID 1034969 Uninitialized scalar variable
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via bbe09b3 Add missing SMB2/SMB3 share capability flag define
via 06e5401 lsa4: Fix a set but unused variable warning
via 7d5daaa lsa4: Remove an unused variable
via 2448fe3 lsa4: Remove an unused variable
via 720b4d3
35 matches
Mail list logo
