Re: [Samba] Re: PDC without profiles?

2004-07-20 Thread Paul Gienger
Michael Lueck wrote: On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:31:03 -0500, Paul Gienger wrote: Rather than monkey with each client, just don't define a [profiles] share. I'll check one of our setups tomorrow, we have a site with no roaming there (for now). I did not have a roaming share defined and Win2K

Re: [Samba] Re: PDC without profiles?

2004-07-20 Thread Paul Gienger
Michael Lueck wrote: Also remember, every change you make to a client is one more thing to screw up If you're going to compute that way, then put the computer back in the box and leave it on the client's desk and tell them to never open the box! ;-) When doing sysadmin isn't your only job,

Re: [Samba] Re: PDC without profiles?

2004-07-20 Thread Simon Hobson
Paul Gienger wrote: So do us a favor and let us in on what you're using in case anyone else wants to know... FWIW, we took on a temp (someone we know who was 'between jobs') to do a rollout of XP. He introduced us to Symantec Ghost which seems quite a useful tool. I don't think it cost us much,

Re: [Samba] Re: PDC without profiles?

2004-07-20 Thread Michael Lueck
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 07:51:34 -0500, Paul Gienger wrote: So do us a favor and let us in on what you're using in case anyone else wants to know... In many areas I develop my own for use within LDS consulting. Vendor tools I care to suggest would be Prism Pack from New Boundary Technologies on

Re: [Samba] Re: PDC without profiles?

2004-07-20 Thread Paul Gienger
So sorry to hear you end up with off-site machines with no remote access. Unacceptable in my book. VPN back door, SSH, NetOp, and electronic software distribution of course. Actually, this usually happens only for a couple weeks to months before the office gets in the VPN. In this case,

Re: [Samba] Re: PDC without profiles?

2004-07-20 Thread Joshua Ginsberg
Wow! The blank logon path worked! Thanks so much!! -jag On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 06:31, Paul Gienger wrote: Michael Lueck wrote: On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:31:03 -0500, Paul Gienger wrote: Rather than monkey with each client, just don't define a [profiles] share. I'll check one of our