Dale Schroeder wrote:
On 06/24/2011 12:11 AM, Linda W wrote:
David was trying to view and change permissions on a user that was
already listed on the security tab; he was not adding a user or group.
I did this just now, changed it to full control for the one listed
user and group
Ok, thanks for your replies, frankly I still don't understand why Samba
behaves like this, sounds like an inherent issue, then I can live with that.
2011/6/25 Linda Walsh sa...@tlinx.org
Dale Schroeder wrote:
On 06/24/2011 12:11 AM, Linda W wrote:
David was trying to view and change
As for diffs on Security and Advanced tab -- see MS.
(It's a feature...they don't show the exact same info...but close)...
Yes. They are often referred to as molecular and atomic permissions.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
As for diffs on Security and Advanced tab -- see MS.
(It's a feature...they don't show the exact same info...but close)...
Atomic vs Molecular permissions
Quoting from http://blog.emagined.com/2009/12/08/windows-security-part-7/
«
(...) Although the exact permissions available depend on
Dale Schroeder wrote:
David,
Samba does not have the ability to change the permissions of directories
on the security tab, and many times they will not be displayed either.
As you have already discovered, permissions on directories are changed
in Advanced. The permissions of files can be
Linda W wrote:
I just tried this --
I was able to add a Domain group, and give it 'full permissions'
on the ACL and save it.
'RIGHTS' / priviledges work as well...(just tried it)
FWIW, I use the 'xfs' file system.
It requires no special options to enable acl or
David,
Samba does not have the ability to change the permissions of directories
on the security tab, and many times they will not be displayed either.
As you have already discovered, permissions on directories are changed
in Advanced. The permissions of files can be manipulated on the
