If you could find a spare server box somewhere, it is always nice to
have the luxury of building a test machine to trial a new system before
finally pulling the plug on a reliable known-to-work system.
AFAIK samba 3.0.4 is the latest stable version, most new distros now
include it (eg Slackware
Hiya
I've got FreeBSD and Samba 2.2 running quite nicely on a server I ma
using for web page development. This is on a 3 PC network at home
using fixed IP addresses 192.168.0.x etc.
However, last night I tried to make it into a PDC following the PDC
Howto document. all seemed well till I
Is there another way to make shares readable to 16 bit apps that use the
8.3 filename. because with out specifying mangling method = hash the
file names are completly mangled and only the first letter remains the
same. Where as mangling method = hash only mangles the last 3 letters.
Carl.
Carl
Dear lists...
But this still un-solved the real problem to join w2k to samba3-ldap .
I'm here with the same situation.
I even switch my distro to SuSe with same result, still cant join domain.
Please give us hint how to solve or debug this problem.
regards
reza
-Original Message-
i try to configure samba 3 as NT4 BDC or domain member with a whitebox linux
i follow
http://www.comp.hkbu.edu.hk/docs/s/samba30/htmldocs/howto/NT4Migration.html
but get following error
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# net rpc join -S serveur -w LSCOT -U Administrateur%xxx
Joined domain LSCOT.
[EMAIL
Hello,
i have a little problem here:
Using Samba 2.2.2 with IBM ClearCase (2003) on a Sun Solaris 8 machine (2
cpus, 4G ram) (IBM does not support Samba 3.0 with Clearcase, maybe Samba
3.0 will fix the problem, but not able to test it yet). There are more than
100 smbd processes running in
Hi,
there are a few things to do to get this working with samba-2.x.x:
1.) build the vfs-modules, they are not compiled by the default makefile
in samba 2.x.x. To do this go in the samba-2.x.x/examples/VFS
directory and do a ./configure; make
2.) copy the module recycle/recycle.so to a
Hi,
First of all, my apologies for the extension of this message, but it is
needeed for you to undertand my problem.
Straight to the point: i have this domain in my company running in Samba
3.0.2
My users are: hcoelho, jardim, gamito, yesenia, smatias, fqueiros,
faugusto, vamaro, peixinho,
I am trying to install Samba version 3.0.4 to work with SSL on an IBM server
7029 running AIX version 5.1 maint level4.
The C compiler installed on the server is vac.C version 6.0.0.0
The steps i have taken so far are
from the source directory i have run ./configure--with-ssl which completed
Hi,
your first attempt with using force group is correct, but your syntax
is not.
for force group you have to omit the '@' sign. it only takes the name
of the group.
for example :
force group = f
at least thats the way it works for me ;-)
Christoph
Mario Gamito schrieb:
Hi,
First of all,
Hello!
We are using samba3-3.0.2a-30 as a PDC.
Everything is working fine, but now we would like to use user policies.
As I learned that can be done by the ntuser.pol file in the 'profiles'
user sub directory on the PDC.
So her is what i already tried:
1.) Set up a test Window$ 2000 Client
Hi Christoph,
Thank you for your answer.
ok, i did that.
i suppose that now, assignin the user's primary group as their own, they
also can access their homes, right ?
Warm Regards,
Mário Gamito
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 10:43, Christoph Scheeder wrote:
Hi,
your first attempt with using force
Hi,
you shouldn't need to force a group in the homes share, and using
fore group in another share shouldn't affect the homes share at all.
I guess the effect of locking out your users from their homes in
your first attempt with force group resulted from samba missbehaving
with the @ sign in your
Hello,
I have a problem with installation of winbindd and samba.
I saw on a mailing-list you had the same problem a few month ago.
Did you find the solution ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hi,
first:
3.0beta2 is verry outdated. please go and get the latest stable version
from samba.org.
second:
after completing step 1, if your problem persists could you
be more detailed what your problem is? we can't read your mind... ;-)
third:
have you read all the doc's available with samba?
Hi all,
I'm trying to use Samba with ldap, and when i user try to logon
in my domain, i got this message in my log:
string_to_sid: Sid
S-1-5-21-1555867097-2400918380-3197679675-3040-2027 does not start
with 'S-'
how can i solve this?
Thanks,
--
=
Deal all,
I'd like to use winbind capabilities on AIX servers (AIX 4.3.3 and AIX
5.2). In particular, I'd like to define share access based on NT group.
I think I've successfully setup my Samba suite, I've entered my AIX box
in my NT domain and playing with wbinfo (-t, or -a user%passwd) works
Michael Lueck wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:31:03 -0500, Paul Gienger wrote:
Rather than monkey with each client, just don't define a [profiles]
share. I'll check one of our setups tomorrow, we have a site with no
roaming there (for now).
I did not have a roaming share defined and Win2K
Paul Gienger wrote:
Actually, on that server we also have a blank logon path specified which
is populated on the other servers. This is on 2.2.8, so YMMV, but I
would guess it works on 3.0.x.
That might be it as I did not have that set blank until long after my join the
domain package had the
Michael Lueck wrote:
Also remember, every change you make to a client is one more thing to
screw up
If you're going to compute that way, then put the computer back in the
box and leave it on the client's desk and tell them to never open the
box! ;-)
When doing sysadmin isn't your only job,
Dear all,
Im trying to set up Samba so that linux users can use the new unix
extensions to be able to chmod their files as they wish. However I
seem to be having problems with masks.
Whether using smbfs or smbclient trying to do: chmod 777 testfile
results only in read permissions for group and
Paul Gienger wrote:
So do us a favor and let us in on what you're using in case anyone
else wants to know...
FWIW, we took on a temp (someone we know who was 'between jobs') to
do a rollout of XP. He introduced us to Symantec Ghost which seems
quite a useful tool. I don't think it cost us much,
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 07:51:34 -0500, Paul Gienger wrote:
So do us a favor and let us in on what you're using in case anyone else
wants to know...
In many areas I develop my own for use within LDS consulting.
Vendor tools I care to suggest would be Prism Pack from New Boundary
Technologies on
So sorry to hear you end up with off-site machines with no remote access.
Unacceptable in my book. VPN back door, SSH, NetOp, and electronic software
distribution of course.
Actually, this usually happens only for a couple weeks to months before
the office gets in the VPN. In this case,
Has anybody managed to get this working under linux and if not does anybody
mount windows shares under linux without user intervention?
Thanks in advance
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Recently, I looked at some options implementing unusual file systems
in userland.
On Linux, there is LUFS and similar stuff which frees one from touching
any kernel code. The design is always similar: a generic kernel module
forwards calls to a user level daemon and forwards returned results
back.
So I've spent a couple of hours on this and I think I've found the problem.
I have cups and samba running on the print/file server.
I have a 2k and and XP system as clients.
All are in the same workgroup.
I started with share-level security, and everything worked okay.
Then I decided to tighten
I am trying to install Samba version 3.0.4 to work with SSL on an IBM server
7029 running AIX version 5.1 maint level4.
The C compiler installed on the server is vac.C version 6.0.0.0
The steps i have taken so far are
from the source directory i have run ./configure--with-ssl which completed
P
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin
|$| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
\__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On
Mark --
XP Pro and XP Pro SP1 mixed. Thanks!
-jag
On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 17:49, Mark Sarria wrote:
What version of Windows are you running?
Mark Sarria
www.msdigitaldzines.com
serving up Linux everyday, non-stop
- Original Message -
From: Joshua Ginsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Wow! The blank logon path worked! Thanks so much!!
-jag
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 06:31, Paul Gienger wrote:
Michael Lueck wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:31:03 -0500, Paul Gienger wrote:
Rather than monkey with each client, just don't define a [profiles]
share. I'll check one of our
Okay. I got it. I am posting it for posterity.
Yes, it was something stupid, as I suspected. I am stunned no one has run
into this yet.
Since we are dealing with ADS, I thought it would be safe to refer to things
in ads nomanclature. Aparently not the case with the password server. The
Hello again,
Please understand, that this post was meant to flame no one. I have said it
before and I say it now, I believe the samba team to be nothing less than
saintly. The world owes them a debt of gratitude.
I just wonder if some gurus outside the samba team should be delegated to
Le Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 11:17:06PM +1000, John Simovic a ecrit:
Has anybody managed to get this working under linux and if not does anybody
mount windows shares under linux without user intervention?
yes, you can use the pam's libpam-mount module for this. Note that if you
want to mount windows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Allison wrote:
|To be honest, you really need to realize WHOM you sent this to... Jeremy
|Allison, is not the person *I* would send this to.
|
|
| Oh I don't see why not, I ask as many stupid questions
| as anyone :-) :-).
It's true. Why just
Craig White wrote:
On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 19:34, Jos Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
http://samba.idealx.org/smbldap-howto.fr.html as you
recommended. I have one big question, which one do I
put in '/etc/ldap.conf'
nss_base_passwd dc=wbcoll,dc=edu?one
nss_base_shadow dc=wbcoll,dc=edu?one
I have built 3.0.5rc1 for testing, with the same options I was using for
3.0.5pre1. Unfortunately, however, when I build this one, everything tanks
(save for one or two smaller utils) and dumps core. I have attached my
configure script, shamelessly swiped from HP (but edited a little bit for
Mohammad Reza wrote:
Dear lists...
But this still un-solved the real problem to join w2k to samba3-ldap .
I'm here with the same situation.
I even switch my distro to SuSe with same result, still cant join domain.
Please give us hint how to solve or debug this problem.
Sorry, I looked at the
Hi!
Here's my problem. I have a backup server. It's a Fedora Core 2 box with
Samba 3.0.3-5. The client is Win XP. When I try to access to the network
drive of my server with my backup software, the program said that the access
is denied. But, when I mount the network drive, I can read, execute
I was having trouble sleeping last night, so I start
going over your past e-mails. Do you remember you
asking me that I need to make sure LDAP is
authenticating system users? And I told you that it
was. I was not completely lying, it authenticates
'testuser1' with no problem. However,
I setup Samba a while ago in an active directory environment.
There are many trusted domains (with a very lot lot of users and computer
account), but i (my users) used only one, and all worked just fine
Actually, some from others domains needs to connect to my shares. And even
if i do not setupe
abebe lsslp wrote:
I was having trouble sleeping last night, so I start
going over your past e-mails. Do you remember you
asking me that I need to make sure LDAP is
authenticating system users? And I told you that it
was. I was not completely lying, it authenticates
'testuser1' with no problem.
hello,
I've upgraded my samba server to samba 3.02. The roaming profiles works
fine. But I've got a problem with the workstation accounts. On some
machine (not all of them), I can't load any roaming profile. I've got to
log localy as administrator and to join manually the domain. Then
everything
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Maier, Thomas wrote:
| Hello,
|
| i have a little problem here:
|
| Using Samba 2.2.2 with IBM ClearCase (2003) on a Sun Solaris
| 8 machine (2 cpus, 4G ram) (IBM does not support Samba 3.0
| with Clearcase, maybe Samba 3.0 will fix the problem, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi
|
| Could you suggest where I can download a samba-2.2.6 or
| samba-2.2.9 rpm for Redhat Linux v7.1.
| I am presently using a samba-2.2.3a server but Windows
| XP clients create extra files when saving or copying to
| this
you can change mangle prefix to specify the number of characters you
want to stay the same. Just remember the more letters that remain the
same the more likely you will get a collision and slow things down.
Carl Matthews wrote:
Is there another way to make shares readable to 16 bit apps that use
1. Is it possible to build/run the Samba _server_ on Windows
(e.g. using Cygwin)?
a quick ./configure test on Cygwin results in:
...
checking whether to use included popt... ./popt
checking configure summary... ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba
would be unsafe
configure: error:
Hi all,
I am running a Samba 3.0.0-14.3E server on a RedHat Enterprise WS3.
Here's the problem:
When I am connected from my PC (Windows 2000) and run the
MacAffee v4.5.1 virus scanner on the connected share, I see the following
in the Samba log file (debug level=2) for what appears to be each
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Derek Holden wrote:
| I am experiencing slowdown due to changes introduced
| after 3.0.1 to the various DC lookup routines. I have
| it narrowed down but don't know where to go from here.
| First the relevant pieces of the conf:
|
| [global]
|
Hello, I'm french so sorry for my mistakes.
I have samba server 2.2.8 on mdk and one PC on Fedora Core II in local
network.
I have mounted some smb directory on my FC2 .
All work fine but just i can't delete any directory on my FC2 however i
have all the rights.
That made 4 days that I seek but I
Dear Dr. Samba,
This is an invitation for you to attend two IPSI BgD multidisciplinary and
interdisciplinary conferences, one in Hawaii, and one in Amalfi, as follows:
IPSI-2005 HAWAII
Big Island Hawaii (arrival: 06.01.2005. departure: 09.01.2005.)
Deadlines: 1 October 2004 (abstract) + 30
Hello,
We have a windows 2003 server hosting ADS. We also have a fedora core 2 file
server running samba 3.0.2a.
We have it currently configured to join the ADS domain. We Can use Winbind
to see users, groups, etc. We can even browse samba shares from windows
computers. However one thing
Greetings NG-
I'm putting together a Samba domain for the first time, using
3.0.2a-Debian. I have created a good smb.conf file (based on the Howto
book by John Terpstra), including the following line to disable roaming
profiles everywhere:
logon path =
Thanks to Josh Ginsberg and
I have some more information and a possible clue to
what is going on here.
1) The chmod was only happening to files that I did not own.
2) These files were on Samba shares that I had write access to.
Readonly shares did not give me this behavior on any file.
Writable shares only gave me this
Thank you for the response!
1. In what situtation do I need People group as the group for
machines?
Always. Until they fix the bug/design issue that is.
OK, I reconfigured smb.conf and smbldap_config.pm to Users for users,
Groups for groups, and People for computers.
2.
I know this might be out in left field, but have you checked your
hosts.allow and hosts.deny files in /etc?
Patti Clark
-Original Message-
From: Robert Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 4:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] The next Logical Check
Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm having a problem where I can gain the lock but the process is
still writing to the file.
OK, I realized that putting python in might have scared away anyone
that knew C enough to help me out on my problem so I wrote a tiny
util to look at the fcntl
Herb Lewis schrieb:
you can change mangle prefix to specify the number of characters you
want to stay the same. Just remember the more letters that remain the
same the more likely you will get a collision and slow things down.
http://de.samba.org/samba/docs/man/smb.conf.5.html
mangling method (G)
I'm having a problem where I can gain the lock but the process is
still writing to the file.
If your building a 'drop box' so to speak, where a process picks up
files after they are copied in, perhaps you want to look into hooking
for application into 'fam'
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/fam/
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 10:22:02AM +0200, Maier, Thomas wrote:
Hello,
i have a little problem here:
Using Samba 2.2.2 with IBM ClearCase (2003) on a Sun Solaris 8 machine (2
cpus, 4G ram) (IBM does not support Samba 3.0 with Clearcase, maybe Samba
3.0 will fix the problem, but not able to
Hello all,
Forgive me as this is probably a common question. However, I could not find an answer
while searching.
I have a few Linux servers running Samba 2.2.x that are hosting open shares with guest
read/write access. I would like to have these become a member of the active directory
and
Thanks to Jim C. for his suggestion of winbind, which I will also pursue.
However, this specific problem was corrected by moving the private directory
from NFS to a local filesystem.
I recall experiencing this situation before. Okay, Solaris gurus, what exactly
causes this problem? Is it
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 04:11:57PM -0400, Mike Box wrote:
Thanks to Jim C. for his suggestion of winbind, which I will also pursue.
However, this specific problem was corrected by moving the private directory
from NFS to a local filesystem.
I recall experiencing this situation before.
I'm trying to learn about the interactions between SAMBA and win2k DCs. The
eventual goal is to have a Win2k server with ADS working with a freeBSD
SAMBA server. I've used the setup from
http://oslabs.mikro-net.com/fbsd_samba.html as the basis for what I've done
so far. Winbind seems to work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Green wrote:
...
| Does anyone else use samba as a drop box for a unix process?
|
| Is there anyway to make a file be locked upon creation with the copy
| command? I have a hard time figuring out all the paramters for
| open_file_shared1
Chris,
Just don't do roaming profiles... thread on that recently in this list.
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
Remove the upper case letters NOSPAM to contact me directly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
O Plameras wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I have two LDAP Servers with similar configurations.
| The main difference is that one runs Linux Fedora 1 and the other Linux
| Fedora 2. The Fedora 2 server runs
| correctly whilst the Fedora 1 LdAP doesn't with the error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for the response!
And thank you for also posting in plaintext. That fonted stuff was
tough to read.
2. Should the PDC itself be in the ldap backend database?
I haven't found a good reason that it 'has' to in my tests.
I did join PDC to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris wrote:
| Since we are dealing with ADS, I thought it would be
| safe to refer to things in ads nomanclature. Aparently
| not the case with the password server. The
| error output was likewise misleading:
|
| [2004/07/15 11:55:43, 1]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Dickie wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I'm seeing this in log.winbind
|
| [2004/07/16 13:26:57, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725)
| tdb(/var/lib/samba/winbindd_idmap.tdb): rec_free_read bad magic
Bad news. Hope you have a backup of. Not much you
can do but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
William Beilstein wrote:
| The translate command did what I needed. Why isn't it in any of the man
| pages? It would have saved all of us effort. Thanks to Giulio! Your answer
| was much appreciated.
Your right. Apparently it is missing from the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philip Chambers wrote:
| A couple of days ago I sent a message about trying to
| build 3.0.4 under IRIX6 and having make fail
| because smbd/quota.h could not find devnm.h.
| I got no suggestions as to how to work out what the
| problem was. I have
Adam Tauno WIlliams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If your building a 'drop box' so to speak, where a process picks up
files after they are copied in, perhaps you want to look into hooking
for application into 'fam'
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/fam/
Thanks for the pointer. My problem isn't
I have an NT domain, and I DON'T want to go to AD, and I DO want to move
off NT4 to Linux for my servers.
I have set up a Fedora Core 2 server in my domain. The domain recognizes
it and it the other servers (oddly enough I am having some, but not
complete printer problems. Well thta is a
Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This kind og question is probably better suited for
the samba-technical mailing list. I would repost there.
Ah thanks a bunch,
Chris
--
Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chicken's thinkin'
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I'm a little unclear about something. I want my Linux
| box to be the Local Browse Master -- so that the machine
| that's on all the time is the one that other computers
| look to.
|
| Is it correct that I want in my Global
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rudolf Polzer wrote:
| What exactly does the POSIX locking option do?
|
| I know what it does NOT do: flock() the files a Windows machine has
| locked. When for example a file is locked on server side (Linux, I
| tried all three Debian samba releases
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mattias Andersson wrote:
| I'm trying to change permissions and add shares and
| remove shares etc.. on my Samba-hosts shares (running 3.0.4
| on Fedora, using the Computer Management-tool on Windows
| Server 2003. I have set security = ads on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Balicki wrote:
| Earlier today I installed Windows XP SP2 RC2 onto
| two of my production machines. My test boxes were
| fine, but the two production machines I installed
| them on failed to print in Adobe Reader and IE.
|
| I've got a Samba
Okay, the jist of this whole thing, I get this infamous (?) problem, I
have been trying to search though the archives of samba-general on gmane
and also in my archive of this list. I have only seen requests for the
magical answer.
Environment: W2K/W2K3 mixed ADS going Native ADS only soon. Samba
Who said there was no support on this list? Look at that, Jerry's
posting by truckloads!
--
David Morel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 09:51:25PM +0200, Thomas Bork wrote:
Herb Lewis schrieb:
you can change mangle prefix to specify the number of characters you
want to stay the same. Just remember the more letters that remain the
same the more likely you will get a collision and slow things down.
Hi all,
I am new to the list, I have setup samba using solaris package samba-3.0.2a
I am running solaris 8. Everything seems to be working fine. But one thing,
when I
bash-2.03# ./smbstatus
sessionid.tdb not initialised
Service pid machine Connected at
Hi,
Is character set = ISO8859-15 still an valid option under samba-3.0.x?
When I run testparm, it complains Unknown parameter encountered.
Regards,
Norman
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Fix provided below.
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 18:06, Greg Folkert wrote:
Okay, the jist of this whole thing, I get this infamous (?) problem, I
have been trying to search though the archives of samba-general on gmane
and also in my archive of this list. I have only seen requests for the
magical
I have the same problem.
The log file said:
# [2004/07/20 21:46:47, 0]
passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_update_sam_account(1512)
# ldapsam_update_sam_account: failed to modify user with uid = king$, error:
modify/delete: sambaPrimaryGroupSID: no such value (Success)
# [2004/07/20 21:46:49, 0]
Hello Paul,
Thank you for the help. Now I am back to my original question: I cannot add
NT4 machine to the samba domain!
I tried to use the Identification changes from NT4 system to sign into the
domain, it said The machine account for this computer does not exist or is
anaccessible.
The log
OK, I just figured out how to do it.
My NT4 workstation is called king.
Use 'smbldap-useradd -w king' to add the posixAccount: king$.
Then use 'smbpasswd -a -m king' to add the samba account. You will have
# smbldap-usershow king$
dn: uid=king$,ou=Computers,dc=sunix,dc=com
objectClass:
OK, I just figured out how to do it.
My NT4 workstation is called king.
Use 'smbldap-useradd -w king' to add the posixAccount: king$.
Then use 'smbpasswd -a -m king' to add the samba account. You will have
# smbldap-usershow king$
dn: uid=king$,ou=Computers,dc=sunix,dc=com
objectClass:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:09:34 -0500, Chris Richards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy. I have observed a horrific performance problem in my setup.
I'm running samba on a Linux Fedora Core 1 machine with Windows
clients. The samba server is communicating with a Windows 98 machine.
Cycling both
I have a pair of log files of similar size and format that always are
truncated somewhere at around the 16000'th out of 19000+ lines when I
copy them from a Samba 2.2.8 VMS system to a Linux system running Samba
3.0.4 and smbfs (Linux 2.6.7). A dir/full of one of the files is as
follows:
Author: metze
Date: 2004-07-20 20:30:29 + (Tue, 20 Jul 2004)
New Revision: 1552
Added:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/idl/krb5pac.idl
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/config.m4
Log:
commit the first version of the pidl generated krb5 PAC parser
NOTE: there a lot of work
Author: jra
Date: 2004-07-20 22:17:19 + (Tue, 20 Jul 2004)
New Revision: 173
Modified:
trunk/smbdotconf/filename/manglingmethod.xml
Log:
Update to note hash2 is the default - noticed by Thomas Bork [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Jeremy.
WebSVN:
Author: jra
Date: 2004-07-21 01:32:09 + (Wed, 21 Jul 2004)
New Revision: 1553
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/rpc_client/cli_srvsvc.c
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/rpcclient/cmd_srvsvc.c
Log:
Good patch from Guenther Deschner [EMAIL PROTECTED] to display share ACL
entries from
Author: jra
Date: 2004-07-21 01:32:47 + (Wed, 21 Jul 2004)
New Revision: 1554
Modified:
trunk/source/rpc_client/cli_srvsvc.c
trunk/source/rpcclient/cmd_srvsvc.c
Log:
Good patch from Guenther Deschner [EMAIL PROTECTED] to display share ACL
entries from rpcclient.
Jeremy.
WebSVN:
Author: jerry
Date: 2004-07-21 02:31:41 + (Wed, 21 Jul 2004)
New Revision: 1555
Added:
tags/release-2-2-9/
Log:
never tagged the 2.2.9 release. Doing some housekeeping
WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1555nolog=1
Author: deryck
Date: 2004-07-21 03:01:51 + (Wed, 21 Jul 2004)
New Revision: 158
Added:
trunk/security.html
Removed:
trunk/security.html
Log:
Updating security page format per discussion with
jerry. Should be close to being ready with some
minor tweaks.
--deryck
WebSVN:
Author: sharpe
Date: 2004-07-21 04:24:30 + (Wed, 21 Jul 2004)
New Revision: 1557
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/nsswitch/winbindd.c
Log:
Add sigchld handling to winbindd. Next step is to have the child restarted if
need be. We should also make sure the main line know we no longer
Author: deryck
Date: 2004-07-21 04:45:06 + (Wed, 21 Jul 2004)
New Revision: 159
Added:
branches/tmp.samba.org/local_footer.html
Modified:
branches/tmp.samba.org/footer.html
branches/tmp.samba.org/header2.html
branches/tmp.samba.org/style/samba.css
Log:
This is a pass at
Author: deryck
Date: 2004-07-21 05:43:55 + (Wed, 21 Jul 2004)
New Revision: 160
Added:
branches/tmp.samba.org/images/bug_logo.png
Log:
Making an attempt at a logo for bugzilla. Mostly
for Vance to play with.
--deryck
WebSVN:
100 matches
Mail list logo
