On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 15:26 +, philippe.simo...@swisscom.com wrote:
Hi Andrew, and by putting more num-callers :
valgrind --num-callers=50 samba -i -M single
Thanks for getting me that. I've managed to reproduce it here, but not
under valgrind, and only when I hack the code to force a
-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 9:09 AM
To: Simonet Philippe, ITS-OUS-OP-IFM-NW-IPE
Cc: sa...@samba.org; samba-techni...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] [PATCH] Workaround very slow nss_winbind, fix crash
on the AD DC (particularly for backups
Cc: sa...@samba.org; samba-techni...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] [PATCH] Workaround very slow nss_winbind, fix crash
on the AD DC (particularly for backups)
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 08:10 +, philippe.simo...@swisscom.com wrote:
I tried both, and I get still crashes :
0001
Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 9:09 AM
To: Simonet Philippe, ITS-OUS-OP-IFM-NW-IPE
Cc: sa...@samba.org; samba-techni...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] [PATCH] Workaround very slow nss_winbind, fix crash
on the AD DC (particularly for backups)
On Fri, 2013-06
Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 9:09 AM
To: Simonet Philippe, ITS-OUS-OP-IFM-NW-IPE
Cc: sa...@samba.org; samba-techni...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] [PATCH] Workaround very slow nss_winbind, fix crash
on the AD DC (particularly for backups)
On Fri, 2013
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 08:10 +, philippe.simo...@swisscom.com wrote:
I tried both, and I get still crashes :
0001-gensec-work-around-nested-event-loops-by-ensuring-th.patch
0002-s4-winbind-Add-special-case-for-BUILTIN-domain.patch
-
samba version 4.0.6 started.
Copyright
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 17:08 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 08:10 +, philippe.simo...@swisscom.com wrote:
I tried both, and I get still crashes :
0001-gensec-work-around-nested-event-loops-by-ensuring-th.patch
Hi Andrew,
many thanks for you patch,
i tested it on 2 different systems but without success (the crash is always
happening).
before applying the patch, I had a strange problem : I couldn't reproduce the
problem (with wbinfo --uid-info 300)
on one of the machine. no chance even if I
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 05:58 +, philippe.simo...@swisscom.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
many thanks for you patch,
i tested it on 2 different systems but without success (the crash is always
happening).
before applying the patch, I had a strange problem : I couldn't reproduce
the problem
Hi Andrew,
sorry (my English...) I was not clear. I tried to say that the patch does not
change anything for me,
the crash is still here.
best regards
Philippe
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 9:18 AM
To: Simonet
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 07:23 +, philippe.simo...@swisscom.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
sorry (my English...) I was not clear. I tried to say that the patch does not
change anything for me,
the crash is still here.
Which (named) patch did you try?
I've attached both patches which I proposed.
I tried both, and I get still crashes :
0001-gensec-work-around-nested-event-loops-by-ensuring-th.patch
0002-s4-winbind-Add-special-case-for-BUILTIN-domain.patch
-
samba version 4.0.6 started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2012
samba: using 'single' process model
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 10:07 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:49:37PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
This patch attempts to address an issue some have reported where our
nss_winbind is even slower than it's simple non-caching implementation
needs to be.
I think
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:49:37PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
This patch attempts to address an issue some have reported where our
nss_winbind is even slower than it's simple non-caching implementation
needs to be.
I think this comes from us not handling the BUILTIN domain properly, and
14 matches
Mail list logo
