Re: problem with hald

2011-03-10 Thread Faye Gibbins
Hi, Yep, that's what I'm leaning towards. Faye On 09/03/11 15:57, Steven Timm wrote: any reason you can't just turn hald off? Most servers don't need it. Steve Timm On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, Faye Gibbins wrote: Hi, I've got one very special machine that has about 15,000 - 20,000 automount

Re: problem with hald

2011-03-10 Thread Charles G Waldman
On 09/03/11 15:57, Steven Timm wrote: any reason you can't just turn hald off? Most servers don't need it. Steve Timm Furthermore note that HAL is deprecated and scheduled for removal ... - Charles

problem with hald

2011-03-09 Thread Faye Gibbins
Hi, I've got one very special machine that has about 15,000 - 20,000 automount entries. Things are fine until about 5000 mount points are mounted up then any further adding (in a tight bash loop) slows dramatically and hald starts taking more and more CPU. Memeory usage is well below

Re: problem with hald

2011-03-09 Thread Steven Timm
any reason you can't just turn hald off? Most servers don't need it. Steve Timm On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, Faye Gibbins wrote: Hi, I've got one very special machine that has about 15,000 - 20,000 automount entries. Things are fine until about 5000 mount points are mounted up then any further