Re: MUSCLE Re: 61 XX
David Corcoran wrote: Hello, Points well taken. It seems unanimous that the driver should take care of Get Response. I shall update the IFD Handler documentation to reflect this. Thank you so much for your suggestions. Jim rees said: I agree that the application should not have to deal with this. But I don't think the driver should either. Anything that every driver must do in the same way really belongs at a higher level, in pc/sc. And I quite agree with him. The GET RESPONSE must be handle at a higher level between the driver and the application. -- Laurent Boulard perl -e 'print(pack(h38,34f6e67627164757c6164796f6e63702b3d292))' *** Unix Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/ To unsubscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe sclinux ***
AW: MUSCLE Re: 61 XX
One question: How does the reader know which CLA byte to use? In our driver for the ECO5000 we use the CLA byte of the former used command apdu. For example: The command apdu looks like this: 0x00 0xC0 0x00 0x01 0x02 0x3f 0x00 If the driver recognizes that a Get Reponse is neccessary he uses the CLA byte (0x00) of this command. Frank *** Unix Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/ To unsubscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe sclinux ***
Re: MUSCLE Re: 61 XX
On Thu, 02 Aug 2001 09:19:53 +0200 Laurent Boulard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Corcoran wrote: Hello, Points well taken. It seems unanimous that the driver should take care of Get Response. I shall update the IFD Handler documentation to reflect this. Thank you so much for your suggestions. Jim rees said: I agree that the application should not have to deal with this. But I don't think the driver should either. Anything that every driver must do in the same way really belongs at a higher level, in pc/sc. And I quite agree with him. The GET RESPONSE must be handle at a higher level between the driver and the application. -- Laurent Boulard I don't think that the handling should be done in the driver, either. In our implementation GET RESPONSE is done in the ICC Service Provider functions, where I think it fits best. Erika Suortti Computing Centre Helsinki University of Technology *** Unix Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/ To unsubscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe sclinux ***
Re: MUSCLE Re: 61 XX
Mahlzeit On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 08:34:06AM -0700, David Corcoran wrote: Points well taken. It seems unanimous that the driver should take care of Get Response. I shall update the IFD Handler documentation to reflect this. Thank you so much for your suggestions. One question: How does the reader know which CLA byte to use? Mahlzeit endergone Zwiebeltuete *** Unix Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/ To unsubscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe sclinux ***
