Re: MUSCLE Is 61xx handled in your driver?

2001-08-02 Thread Peter Tomlinson
, but its going to be true for some time to come. Regards, Peter T Bristol UK - Original Message - From: Laurent Boulard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 8:08 AM Subject: Re: MUSCLE Is 61xx handled in your driver? David Corcoran wrote: I think you

Re: MUSCLE Is 61xx handled in your driver?

2001-08-02 Thread Peter Tomlinson
CLA INS P1 P2 Lc data Le in 7816-4 speak (section 5.3.1 Fig 3) Peter T Bristol UK - Original Message - From: David Corcoran [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 9:26 PM Subject: Re: MUSCLE Is 61xx handled in your driver? I think you should handle

Re: MUSCLE Is 61xx handled in your driver?

2001-08-01 Thread Laurent Boulard
David Corcoran wrote: I think you should handle the Get Response if your APDU looks like the following: CLA INS p1 p2 p3 lentx xx xx xx xx xx lenrx Is this correct ? In the perfect world yes ! but, sadly, people sometimes doesn't follow correctly the ISO7816 or misunderstood it. I have

RE: MUSCLE Is 61xx handled in your driver?

2001-07-31 Thread John Otaegui
Most readers wont handle this response code. Some POS terminals will. You should send the get response/data command to retrieve the data. John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Naomaru Itoi Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 6:43 PM To:

Re: MUSCLE Is 61xx handled in your driver?

2001-07-31 Thread David Corcoran
Hello, Most of the drivers pass the 61 XX back to the application to handle. I think it is bad practice to handle this in the driver since it is a card specific ISO function. This should happen above the reader abstraction where the card abstraction layer occurs. BTW - has anyone done an OSI

Re: MUSCLE Is 61xx handled in your driver?

2001-07-31 Thread Jim Rees
When a card returns 61.xx, it means that the card has xx byte to return to host. Does a smartcard reader driver handle this, usually? My Todos driver does. It seemed useful at the time. I would like to know whether this is correct or not. Most other reader drivers I have looked at do

Re: MUSCLE Is 61xx handled in your driver?

2001-07-31 Thread Carlos Prados
Hi, I completly agree with Andreas. Get Response is dependant on T=0 transport protocol and must not be handled at application level. This is at least what ISO 7816 says. Towitoko driver 2.0.X handles authomatically the Get Response when the command is Case 3 or Case 4. Also the issues

Re: MUSCLE Is 61xx handled in your driver?

2001-07-31 Thread Jim Rees
I agree that the application should not have to deal with this. But I don't think the driver should either. Anything that every driver must do in the same way really belongs at a higher level, in pc/sc. *** Linux Smart Card Developers

Re: MUSCLE Is 61xx handled in your driver?

2001-07-31 Thread David Corcoran
I think you should handle the Get Response if your APDU looks like the following: CLA INS p1 p2 p3 lentx xx xx xx xx xx lenrx Is this correct ? Dave *** Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards