[scots-l] Re: ABCs

2004-11-12 Thread Nigel Gatherer
Matt Seattle wrote: Nigel, are you sure you got the mode right for Cassino? Sounds decidedly odd IMHO! Matt spots the deliberate mistake this week - glad you're awake, Matt! Yes, of course you're right. The key it's normally in is A dorian - I think - but on the record I took it from it was

Re: [scots-l]ABCs

2004-11-12 Thread John Chambers
Nigel Gatherer writes: | Matt Seattle wrote: | | Nigel, are you sure you got the mode right for Cassino? Sounds | decidedly odd IMHO! | | Matt spots the deliberate mistake this week - glad you're awake, Matt! | | Yes, of course you're right. The key it's normally in is A dorian - I | think - but

Re: [scots-l] Re: ABCs

2004-11-12 Thread Cliff Abrams
The Heights of Cassino seems to be consistently in Dmaj. See The Session.org for abc, sheetmusic and a fascinating discussion of the WWII battle. The postings, rather new, may have come out of this discussion. Except for a note or two, the Session version is, for example, identical to the setting

Re: [scots-l] Re: ABCs

2004-11-12 Thread Matt Seattle
Matt spots the deliberate mistake this week - glad you're awake, Matt! Yes Nigel, but I was really wondering whether it should be mixolydian rather than dorian - ? Posted to Scots-L - The Traditional Scottish Music Culture List - To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to:

[scots-l] Re: ABCs

2004-11-12 Thread Nigel Gatherer
John Chambers wrote: ...It sounds better to me if I play it as Amix. This is the same key sig as Edorian, of course, but the tonic is clearly A. So should the c's be sharp or natural? Sharp all the way. Of course you're right, John - Amix. My infamous fumbling when it comes to talking