Re: Packaging with strawberry perl

2013-03-08 Thread Kartik Thakore
AWESOME On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:54 PM, kmx wrote: > Kartik, > > Try this special edition: > http://strawberryperl.com/**beta/spp-spec-minimal-5.16.3.** > 1-32bit-portable.zip > > Simply: > - unzip into e.g. c:\strawb

Re: Packaging with strawberry perl

2013-03-07 Thread kmx
Kartik, Try this special edition: http://strawberryperl.com/beta/spp-spec-minimal-5.16.3.1-32bit-portable.zip Simply: - unzip into e.g. c:\strawberry-portable - install SDL + all other required modules - remove c:\strawberry-portable\c (the whole directory) - clean c:\strawberry-portable\cpan\*

Re: Packaging with strawberry perl

2013-03-06 Thread kmx
It isn't gonna work as 'Portable' module is loaded behind the scene for example every time you 'use Config;' During the weekend I can prepare a strawberry perl 'Portable Mini Edition' for you (no external libraries, no extra modules, just perl core + dmake + gcc toolchain) - it is easier for m

Re: Packaging with strawberry perl

2013-03-05 Thread Kartik Thakore
hmm what if I cpan install that? Where is the 'script' that runs the portable thing? On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:38 PM, kmx wrote: > Interesting idea. > > My guess is that for portable strawberry you will need to keep at least > perl\vendor\lib\Portable\* > perl\vendor\lib\Portable.pm > + perhaps

Re: Packaging with strawberry perl

2013-03-05 Thread kmx
Interesting idea. My guess is that for portable strawberry you will need to keep at least perl\vendor\lib\Portable\* perl\vendor\lib\Portable.pm + perhaps File::HomeDir and other Portable's prereqs -- kmx On 5.3.2013 20:54, Kartik Thakore wrote: Could I delete all of perl/vendor and install SD

Re: Packaging with strawberry perl

2013-03-05 Thread Kartik Thakore
Could I delete all of perl/vendor and install SDL using cpan. Then remove the cpan stuff? On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:31 PM, kmx wrote: > In theory you can delete whatever in perl/vendor you only cannot be sure > if some of SDL dependencies is not using it. > > -- > kmx > > > On 5.3.2013 17:54, Ka

Re: Packaging with strawberry perl

2013-03-05 Thread kmx
In theory you can delete whatever in perl/vendor you only cannot be sure if some of SDL dependencies is not using it. -- kmx On 5.3.2013 17:54, Kartik Thakore wrote: What about stuff inside perl\vendor and what not. It has a lot of the stuff that is not needed (DBI, BerkelyDB, etc ) On Tue,

Re: Packaging with strawberry perl

2013-03-05 Thread Kartik Thakore
What about stuff inside perl\vendor and what not. It has a lot of the stuff that is not needed (DBI, BerkelyDB, etc ) On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:53 AM, kmx wrote: > > On 5.3.2013 15:18, Kartik Thakore wrote: > >> Hey so, >> I was trying to send a friend a simple SDL script with strawberry perl t

Re: Packaging with strawberry perl

2013-03-05 Thread kmx
On 5.3.2013 15:18, Kartik Thakore wrote: Hey so, I was trying to send a friend a simple SDL script with strawberry perl to play around with. But strawberry perl seemed huge! Especially with the DBI/Pg and what not in it. How can i get a vanilla version of portable strawberry perl with no extra l

Packaging with strawberry perl

2013-03-05 Thread Kartik Thakore
Hey so, I was trying to send a friend a simple SDL script with strawberry perl to play around with. But strawberry perl seemed huge! Especially with the DBI/Pg and what not in it. How can i get a vanilla version of portable strawberry perl with no extra libraries installed with it. I will then jsut