[morrowc.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 10:54 PM
To: Stephen Kent
Cc: g...@ietf.org g...@ietf.org; sidr
Subject: Re: [sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06.txt
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Stephen Kent k...@bbn.com wrote:
Dave,
Fair questions for a somewhat
That's exactly what I meant to say. :) Apologies. Been a long, long week.
Being new to the IETF process, but not the industry, I have some confusion
about GROW I-D's as they can sometimes be very similar or partially overlapping
with IDR and SIDR drafts. Just trying to understand which WG's
Dave,
This is just a cleanup pass on this doc, to address IESG comments. The
doc dates back to June, 2011.
So, perhaps you mean to say that your doc is related to his one :-).
Steve
Seems related to our draft on MITM attacks with BGPSEC lacking path
validation, but expands on other attack
Dave,
Fair questions for a somewhat complex environment.
SIDR develops security standards for inter-domain routing, working
within the context of
BGP standards developed by IDR.
GROW has more of an operations focus, and is intended to provide input
to IDR.
So, your doc on route leaks, if
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Stephen Kent k...@bbn.com wrote:
Dave,
Fair questions for a somewhat complex environment.
SIDR develops security standards for inter-domain routing, working within
the context of
BGP standards developed by IDR.
GROW has more of an operations focus, and is
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Secure Inter-Domain Routing Working Group of
the IETF.
Title : Threat Model for BGP Path Security
Author(s) : Stephen Kent
Seems related to our draft on MITM attacks with BGPSEC lacking path
validation, but expands on other attack vectors.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-simple-leak-attack-bgpsec-no-help/
Thanks.
-d
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 3:36 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
A New
