Hi,
Unfortunately, as far as I know, sipp doesn't look at headers at all when
selecting port (somebody please correct me if I'm wrong, because I don't have
much experience with versions 1.1).
Is the rrs=true in the recv scenario making a difference? (I actually
never used routes in the
Hello,
We encountered some problems using ontimeout attribute with sipp 3.1
On timeout the label is not found - even if it is defined in .xml file -
and the label displayed in error
logged on timeout is bad.
(I tried by adding a:
recv response=300 optional=false ontimeout=9
/recv
and a
If the scenarios require precise synchronization between all the elements
for a single call I would suggest using the extended third party call
control (3pcc) feature of SIPp. Although its name is 3pcc, really it is
just a mechanism to send data between SIPp instances.
Charles
Naresh
Tomasz,
Just sending a note to confirm what you've written; you've got it all
correct. The only minor thing is that in the latest trunks there is a
setdest action that will let you change the host/port to send to.
Charles
Tomasz Radziszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wolfgang,
I tried the scenario with the SVN trunk and did not get an error.
Charles
Kanngiesser, Wolfgang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/07/2008 07:07 AM
To
sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
cc
Subject
[Sipp-users] SIPp3.1 - scenario breaks whith exitcode 139
Hi all,
I've put this in the latest trunk.
My mail reader or yours messed up the patch, if you can please send
patches as MIME attachments. They are harder to read inline, but are
easier to apply.
Charles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/07/2008 06:18:27 PM:
Hey guys, on my system make isn't GNU make
Hello,
As Charles Wrigth requested here goes a xml scenario with the setdest
action in use.
Remember that this will only work with the sipp version compiled from
the sources in the trunk.
Regards
Ricardo Fernandes
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Ricardo Fernandes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi Charles,
I have tried the 3PCC mode, but observed that it does not help me in my
requirement.
Is there anybody who uses SIPp integrated with any other tool that may run
multiple instances automatically and contol them?
naresh
--- On Wed, 9/7/08, Charles P Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
