Hello everyone,
I used google and searched the mailing list, but couldn't find any answers :(
I am trying to recreate a fax call with Sipp, unfortunately I get the following
error:
media_port keyword with no audio or video on the current line (m=image ).
Is there any workaround?
here
Hi Charles,
I knew about nop but definitely not about condexec.
Is it only strcmp, which is available or is strncmp available too?
I am using the latest SVN trunk version and it works fine. Pure joy.
Cheers
David
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Charles P Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nop
There is no support in SIPp right now. To add it you'll need to change
call.cpp to support m=image instead of m=audio and m=video. Search for
PAT_AUDIO and PAT_VIDEO in call.cpp.
Charles
Patrick Miccio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/19/2008 08:29 AM
To
hey,
There is no support in SIPp right now. To add it you'll need to change
call.cpp to support m=image instead of m=audio and m=video. Search for
PAT_AUDIO and PAT_VIDEO in call.cpp.
that worked like a charm :)
THX,
Patrick.
Charles
Patrick Miccio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am trying to use the built-in 3PCC example scenarios. Is there something
special that I need to do to prevent SIPp from thinking that I am using
extended mode. It is not my intention to use extended mode.
C:\files\sippsipp -p 5060 -sn 3pcc-C-B -3pcc 127.0.0.1:4000 127.0.0.1:5063
2008-08-18
hi,
I am getting some errors on my _errors.log file that shows as follows
1219140649.897846: The minor watchdog timer 500ms has been tripped (538), 109
trips remaining..
1219140649.915473: send_packets.c: sendto failed with error: Invalid argument.
Can anyone help me to resolve the same?
If your job permits; it would be great if you could post your patch to the
list for others to use.
yeah :)
attached is the T.38 patch for sipp.3.1
you need to exec the pcap file with the play_pcap_video command!
cheers,
Patrick
Charles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/19/2008
The watchdog error means that SIPp set a timer for 400ms in the future,
but it took 538 ms for it to come around. If this happens often, it is an
indication that your SIPp machine is overloaded.
Charles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/19/2008 11:14:10 AM:
hi,
I am getting some errors on my
hey everyone,
looks like I found a related problem:
I send this SDP info in my INVITE:
m=image 6000 udptl t38
I receive this SDP info in the 200 OK:
m=image 50682 udptl t38
after that I execute:
nop
action
exec play_pcap_video= t38.pcap/
/action
/nop
according to wireshark, sipp will send
Are you refering to the retransmission timer set at SIPp?
How about the second error send_packets.c: sendto failed with error: Invalid
argument, do these are inter-related?
Waiting for some suggestions from you.
thanks,
Naresh
--- On Tue, 19/8/08, Charles P Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
As on a need to respond to unexpected OPTIONS request that we receive on our
test setup, we modified the SIPp source file as follows
File name - call.cpp
Line # - 3735
Original:
else if (((strcmp(P_recv, INFO) == 0) || (strcmp(P_recv, NOTIFY) == 0) ||
(strcmp(P_recv, UPDATE) == 0))
This should be fixed in trunk. In earlier versions change char
number[X] in get_remote_port_media to char number[7], where X 7.
Charles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/19/2008 12:06:21 PM:
hey everyone,
looks like I found a related problem:
I send this SDP info in my INVITE:
m=image
Hello,
I would like to ask again related to SIPp.
In my IPv6 network setup, I tried using the -t un parameter of SIPp so that
each call would have separate socket. However, error occured.
Unable to send UDP messages. Address family not supported.
However, there is no error if t u1 is set.
Is
The timer is set to go off every 400ms. If it takes more than 3000ms for
it to get triggered that is a major trip; 10 of those are a fatal error.
If it takes more than 500ms, it is a minor trip; 120 count as a fatal
error. If no firings occur for 10 minutes the counts are reset. These
Hi,
Can you please suggest me what must be the correction from my end to avoid this
error?
What is the CLI option that you were refering to?
thanks,
Naresh
--- On Wed, 20/8/08, Charles P Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Charles P Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Sipp-users] Some
15 matches
Mail list logo