Re: [Sipp-users] TCP Error Handling Questions

2006-10-24 Thread Charles P Wright
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Charles P Wright Envoyé : mardi 17 octobre 2006 23:12 À : sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Objet : [Sipp-users] TCP Error Handling Questions Hello, I have a question regarding TCP support under congestion in the latest SIPp releases

Re: [Sipp-users] TCP Error Handling Questions

2006-10-23 Thread Klaus Darilion
Charles P Wright Envoyé : mardi 17 octobre 2006 23:12 À : sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net mailto:sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Objet : [Sipp-users] TCP Error Handling Questions Hello, I have a question regarding TCP support under congestion

Re: [Sipp-users] TCP Error Handling Questions

2006-10-20 Thread Bruno, Guerin (NonHP : AtosOrigin)
problem, no investigation has been done yet. Regards Bruno GUERIN -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Charles P Wright Envoyé : mardi 17 octobre 2006 23:12 À : sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Objet : [Sipp-users] TCP Error Handling Questions

Re: [Sipp-users] TCP Error Handling Questions

2006-10-20 Thread Olivier Jacques
Bruno, thanks for the analysis.Charles,as Bruno pointed, we are not very comfortable with the way TCP congestion is currently implemented. Well, there are several outstanding issues wrt TCP:- TCP reads are octet per octet (far from being to say the least!) - There was a message from Ajay Gupta,

[Sipp-users] TCP Error Handling Questions

2006-10-17 Thread Charles P Wright
Hello, I have a question regarding TCP support under congestion in the latest SIPp releases. Previously, there was discussion on the mailing list that pointed out incorrect behavior when the TCP window closed and send returned EWOULDBLOCK or EAGAIN. I looked at the send_message function, and