Re: Latest J2EEStore

2003-11-05 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Resubmitting the latest J2EEStore related classes from our CVS. I have incorporated the point(1) raised by Oliver. Now we have nested try..final blocks for each. Thanks alot Ashok. I will try it out soon. I understand you agree to have it merged with the other store

Re: [VOTE]: J2EE-Adapter or Not

2003-11-05 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
Oliver Zeigermann wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2.) Why do you think the approach in org.apache.slide.store.impl.rdbms is better than yours? Why is there an adapter? Also, where do you see a nicer Java approach? Well with the adaptor then different DB optimizations maybe more easily

Re: [VOTE]: J2EE-Adapter or Not

2003-11-05 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
Oliver Zeigermann wrote: Maybe we should think about a third store using this adapter that also explicitely makes use of connection pooling, e.g. using DBCP. Which really is not necessary as you can configure the driver which can well be org.apache.commons.dbcp.PoolingDriver. Besides I

cvs commit: jakarta-slide/proposals/jcrri/src/javax/jcr TraversingElementVisitor.java

2003-11-05 Thread stefan
stefan 2003/11/05 03:13:45 Modified:proposals/jcrri/src/javax/jcr TraversingElementVisitor.java Log: jcrri: misc. minor stuff Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +1 -1 jakarta-slide/proposals/jcrri/src/javax/jcr/TraversingElementVisitor.java Index:

cvs commit: jakarta-slide/proposals/jcrri/work jcr.log

2003-11-05 Thread stefan
stefan 2003/11/05 03:14:50 Modified:proposals/jcrri build.xml proposals/jcrri/work jcr.log Added: proposals/jcrri ReadMe.txt Removed: proposals/jcrri/lib/common jakarta-oro-2.0.6.jar Log: jcrri: misc. minor stuff Revision ChangesPath 1.2

Re: [VOTE]: J2EE-Adapter or Not

2003-11-05 Thread Colin Britton
I thought this was fixed in Tomcat 4.1 so you could. rgds CB - Original Message - From: Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Slide Developers Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 5:43 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE]: J2EE-Adapter or Not Oliver Zeigermann wrote:

Re: Latest J2EEStore

2003-11-05 Thread Colin Britton
We will move to and continue to develop the new merged store. We also need/want the new ACL handling so we are up for whatever changes it needs. rgds CB - Original Message - From: Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Slide Developers Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE]: J2EE-Adapter or Not

2003-11-05 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
Really? I am using 4.1.27 and could not get the initial context. Does it work for you or are you judging this from what Remy wrote? If it works for you, I must have another problem :( Oliver Colin Britton wrote: I thought this was fixed in Tomcat 4.1 so you could. rgds CB - Original

cvs commit: jakarta-slide/src/share/org/apache/slide/util XMLValue.java

2003-11-05 Thread pnever
pnever 2003/11/05 06:24:38 Modified:src/webdav/server/org/apache/slide/webdav/method PropFindMethod.java PropPatchMethod.java PutMethod.java MoveMethod.java ReportMethod.java CopyMethod.java LockMethod.java

cvs commit: jakarta-slide/testsuite/testsuite/junit/xmltestcases/performance/Size 100k_a_put.xml 100k_b_get.xml 100k_c_propfind.xml 100k_d_proppatch.xml 100k_e_copy.xml 100k_f_move.xml 100k_g_lock.xml 100k_h_delete.xml 10k_a_put.xml 10k_b_get.xml 10k_c_propfind.xml 10k_d_proppatch.xml 10k_e_copy.xml 10k_f_move.xml 10k_g_lock.xml 10k_h_delete.xml 1k_a_put.xml 1k_b_get.xml 1k_c_propfind.xml 1k_d_proppatch.xml 1k_e_copy.xml 1k_f_move.xml 1k_g_lock.xml 1k_h_delete.xml 1m_a_put.xml 1m_b_get.xml 1m_c_propfind.xml 1m_d_proppatch.xml 1m_e_copy.xml 1m_f_move.xml 1m_g_lock.xml 1m_h_delete.xml

2003-11-05 Thread juergen
juergen 2003/11/05 10:17:54 Modified:testsuite/testsuite/junit/xmltestcases/performance/Amount 100a_put.xml 100b_get.xml 100c_mkcol.xml 100d_propfind.xml 100e_proppatch.xml 100f_copy.xml 100g_move.xml 100h_lock.xml