Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
1) what's the status of the tree? I found out that contributed WebDAVGUI
is out of synch with the various libraries and it seems dead. I also
find the distribution way too tomcat centric.
That's true if you want to use Slide authentication for the container. I
agree
pnever 2003/11/12 00:36:40
Modified:src/share/org/apache/slide/structure ObjectNode.java
Log:
Made Binding and BindingList Serializable and Clonable.
Thanks to Steve Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] for reporting:
Although ObjectNode implements Serializable, one of its fields
Just wondering, why does ObjectNode support serializability in the first
place?
Oliver
Steve Vaughan wrote:
Although ObjectNode implements Serializable, one of its fields (BindingList)
is not. BindingList has only one field, which is a Vector. Is their any
reason why BindingList should not
Thanks for reporting, Steve.
Now both, ObjectNode.Binding and ObjectNode.BindingList, are Serializable
and Clonable.
Regards,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Steve Vaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 18:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BindingList is
Edison Too wrote:
Hi,
I agree with Stefano's observation that there is a need for a good
content repository. I've looked into Slide's code before and I can't
help but wonder if it is a good idea for Slide to be implemented
using Avalon.
The server core can be broken down into 3 blocks 1. Content
Well, I just proposed myself for the job of the release
manager on the user list. If poeple accept me for this job or
anybody else volunteers for it, (hopefully) few things stand
in the way of a first milestone release in the near future.
Certainly, I will need commit access to CVS first, but
Martin Dulisch wrote:
Well, I just proposed myself for the job of the release
manager on the user list. If poeple accept me for this job or
anybody else volunteers for it, (hopefully) few things stand
in the way of a first milestone release in the near future.
Certainly, I will need commit access
Definitely agree with Remy on this.
About a year ago, I examined Avalon quite a bit. The IOC part is very nice, but the
framework is a bit too heavy IMO.
Maybe Spring or PicoContainer would be worth examining instead.
If Slide2.0 is becoming close, it would be a bad idea to change too much
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:19:57 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Edison Too wrote:
Hi,
I agree with Stefano's observation that there is a need for a good content
repository. I've looked into Slide's code before and I can't help but wonder
if it is a good idea for Slide to be implemented using Avalon.
I've been playing with a Store implementation which serializes ObjectNodes in
order to provide persistence.
-Steve
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 03:43 am, Nevermann, Dr., Peter wrote:
Good question :)
I fixed ObjectNode just assuming that applications using Slide API directly
(i.e. not
juergen 2003/11/12 06:03:45
Modified:testsuite/testsuite/junit/xmltestcases/BIND/functional/move
moveSingleFolder_overwrite_notBound2.xml
Log:
fix upper/lower case problem that show up on unix (mhm)
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +22 -22
On 12 Nov 2003, at 00:00, Michael Smith wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8 ?
propertyupdate xmlns='DAV:'
set
prop
high-unicode
xmlns='http://webdav.org/neon/litmus/'#65536;/high-unicode
/prop
/set
/propertyupdate
[Note that I reformatted the output, so the
On 12 Nov 2003, at 09:30, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
1) what's the status of the tree? I found out that contributed
WebDAVGUI is out of synch with the various libraries and it seems
dead. I also find the distribution way too tomcat centric.
That's true if you want to
Hello,
I'm trying to get Apache Slide (http://jakarta.apache.org/slide/) to
pass the test and it currently fails two tests:
16. prophighunicode... FAIL (PROPPATCH of property with high
unicode value)
17. propget... FAIL (No value given for property
On 13 Nov 2003, at 00:25, Michael Smith wrote:
Java doesn't tend to cope too well (at least not without significant
extra effort by the programmer) with stuff outside the BMP. It's
probably some sort of bug in JDOM, technically - but I'm not sure
about that. It'd be painful to fix.
well, we
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to get Apache Slide (http://jakarta.apache.org/slide/) to
pass the test and it currently fails two tests:
16. prophighunicode... FAIL (PROPPATCH of property with high
unicode value)
17. propget... FAIL (No value given for property
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 13 Nov 2003, at 00:25, Michael Smith wrote:
Java doesn't tend to cope too well (at least not without significant
extra effort by the programmer) with stuff outside the BMP. It's
probably some sort of bug in JDOM, technically - but I'm not sure
about that. It'd be
Just a note to let you know that there are a number of
threads currently running over on the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
concerning the establishment of a component repository
project. After reading your email I think that many of the
subjects you have addressed below are relevant to the things
the Avalon
Thanks, will check out the Avalon list.
Cheers,
Edison
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 12:50:05 +0100, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Just a note to let you know that there are a number of threads currently
running over on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] concerning the establishment of a
component repository project.
On 12 Nov 2003, at 12:50, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Just a note to let you know that there are a number of
threads currently running over on the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
concerning the establishment of a component repository
project. After reading your email I think that many of the
subjects you have
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 12 Nov 2003, at 12:50, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Just a note to let you know that there are a number of
threads currently running over on the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
concerning the establishment of a component repository
project. After reading your email I think that many
On 12 Nov 2003, at 15:31, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 12 Nov 2003, at 12:50, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Just a note to let you know that there are a number of
threads currently running over on the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
concerning the establishment of a component repository
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 12 Nov 2003, at 15:31, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 12 Nov 2003, at 12:50, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Just a note to let you know that there are a number of
threads currently running over on the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
concerning the
I cannot agree more with Stefano's comment regarding the big-O order of search and
access opertions. We need constant time lookup and queries of information regarding
the artifacts (the meta data) as well as constant time access to an artifact's content
stream regardless of how many artifacts
24 matches
Mail list logo
