Hi Terence,
this is exactly what WebDAV tries to be: A specification that is not
limited to a special programming language.
It's a protocol, but it can be seen it as an api (method names +
(header/body)parameters )
So I'd prefer an API that brings WebDAV to the java world. Some kind of
combination
am particularly
interested in the transactional support.
Regards,
Ritu
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Guggisberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 7:39 PM
To: Slide Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: JSR 170 available for Public Review
Hi Stefan,
is the RI using slide
Hi Stefan,
hi ritu,
I was trying to get the RI of JSR170 under Slide's proposal module on CVS.
But the jcrri folder is empty. Is there an existing RI (other than the one
available with public review) or is it yet to be started?
i will commit the new ri next week. but be aware that the
hi davide
there will be an implementation of the jcr api located in
the slide cvs under /proposals/jcrri, available soon.
this implementation will represent work in progress.
fyi:
i'am working on this proposal, on and off, since feb 2003.
we had to remove the code from the slide cvs a while ago
Hi Stefan,
is the RI using slide as backend or is your implementation a replacement
for the slide core?
As we spent some time on improving the slide backend (tx filestore,
improved db-stores) it would be nice to have this features available by
using the jsr170 api.
What about the webdav layer?
Hi,
I've posted this to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but as there is no open discussion
(mailing list/newsgroup) I post my first impressions into this archive
as well:
I'm currently having a first look at the api and like to share my very
first impressions:
First of all, it looks very mature.
Hi Stefan,
is the RI using slide as backend or is your implementation a replacement
for the slide core?
the current implementation of the ri has no dependencies on slide. it is
a proposal only. what future direction the implementation will take is open.
As we spent some time on improving the
Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
Hi Stefan,
is the RI using slide as backend or is your implementation a replacement
for the slide core?
the current implementation of the ri has no dependencies on slide. it is
a proposal only. what future direction the implementation will take is open.
As we spent
