2004 17:22
To: Slide Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Server API
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 08:59:40 -0800, James Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 14:31 +, Andy Bowes wrote:
The long term goal for our portal is to be able to migrate to a JCR
compliant repository but I reckon
James Mason wrote:
Andy,
Would a JCR (JSR 170) API to Slide be beneficial to your application? An
idea some of the Slide developers have been kicking around is using
Jackrabbit to write a wrapper around the WebDAV API so any
WebDAV-accessible server would be JCR compliant. Interest is fairly low
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 14:31 +, Andy Bowes wrote:
Hi James
Thanks for your message.
A JCR implementation on top of Slide would definitely fit the bill for our
application. I have already made a start on creating a JCR implementation
of our internal framework to enable us to provide
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 08:59:40 -0800, James Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 14:31 +, Andy Bowes wrote:
The long term goal for our portal is to be able to migrate to a JCR
compliant repository but I reckon it will be nearly a year before the major
CMS players introduce
Thanks Andy for your reply!
I have looked at src\webdav\server\org\apache\slide\webdav\method java files,
these methods extends AbstractWebdavMethod which in turn takes
httpservletrequest and httpservletresponse.
In your portal integration, did you have to pass httpservletrequest and
Andy,
Would a JCR (JSR 170) API to Slide be beneficial to your application? An
idea some of the Slide developers have been kicking around is using
Jackrabbit to write a wrapper around the WebDAV API so any
WebDAV-accessible server would be JCR compliant. Interest is fairly low
right now since
