Felix Meschberger schrieb:
Hi,
Jukka Zitting schrieb:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
With JR trunk having branched 1.x off and now heading for 2.0.
What plans, if any does Sling have for moving to 2.0 and 283 support?
With my Jackrabbit release
hi guys,
I think that Sling should be able to run on JCR 1.0 for a long time; we
shouldn't tie us to a new version; however, of course we might have some
optional functionality requiring JCR 2.0.
i think we should naturally embrace jcr 2.0, i don't really think that
we will have
backwards
Hi,
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org wrote:
I think that Sling should be able to run on JCR 1.0 for a long time; we
shouldn't tie us to a new version; however, of course we might have some
optional functionality requiring JCR 2.0.
From a functionality
Hi,
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@gmail.com wrote:
In fact, many Jackrabbit libraries already come as bundles
(jackrabbit-api, jackrabbit-jcr-commons, jackrabbit-jcr-rmi), why not
the rest also ?
Good question. Patches/commits are welcome. :-)
There's already an
2009/5/3 Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk
I think this may be a question of what is exported from the bundle. At the
moment the jackrabbit-server bundle doesn't expose much more than the real
API's which IMHO is correct, however it does mean that customizations have to
live inside the server
On 4 May 2009, at 09:37, Vidar Ramdal wrote:
2009/5/3 Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk
I think this may be a question of what is exported from the bundle.
At the moment the jackrabbit-server bundle doesn't expose much
more than the real API's which IMHO is correct, however it does
mean that
I think this may be a question of what is exported from the bundle. At
the moment the jackrabbit-server bundle doesn't expose much more than
the real API's which IMHO is correct, however it does mean that
customizations have to live inside the server bundle. As you say, this
has been done
Hi,
Jukka Zitting schrieb:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
With JR trunk having branched 1.x off and now heading for 2.0.
What plans, if any does Sling have for moving to 2.0 and 283 support?
With my Jackrabbit release manager hat on I'd recommend
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
With JR trunk having branched 1.x off and now heading for 2.0.
What plans, if any does Sling have for moving to 2.0 and 283 support?
With my Jackrabbit release manager hat on I'd recommend that Sling
wait until Jackrabbit
Hi,
With JR trunk having branched 1.x off and now heading for 2.0.
What plans, if any does Sling have for moving to 2.0 and 283 support?
I am trying to plan where I should be directing internal and community
effort in Sakai being just about ready to commit whole heartedly to
the JR15/Sling
10 matches
Mail list logo
