On Friday, February 18, 2005, 12:43:14 PM, Computer wrote:
CHS Hi Sniffer Folks,
CHS
CHS Here's an interesting article:
CHS http://www.technewsworld.com/story/39578.html
I think this is a rehash of a story that showed up a few weeks ago.
One of the advantages of SNF is that it doesn't use
Also, leading Internet service company AOL (NYSE: AOL) said it noticed
a sharp drop in spam being sent to its members during 2004. Yet most
observers say spam is at least as bad
A result of AOL's aggressive legal stand (helped by their location in VA and
the support by their local law
It needs to be a transport sink, or at least work with one in order to
prevent ongoing issues with brute force
spam floods.
Huh? Why would it need to be a transport sink? Why first accept and store
the message - and then generate bounce messages (in case it's a false
positive)?
Scanning at
The idea being that you don't want any more content searching than is
necessary, particularly when a recipients-dictionary-attack is underway.
Okay, but if you wait until the message is stored in the queue and NOW you
have to scan each one with a command-line process - how is THAT better
Hi Andrew:
The idea being that you don't want any more content searching than is
necessary
The content searching happens at the very end of the protocol conversation.
By that time you already have processed your IP, HELO, SENDER etc. policies
(e.g. DNS BL, local BLs, etc.)
Or are you saying
I guess you essentially got my point and what appears to be Sandy's.
Once you take an Exchange server (or any other server) and insert such
a gateway, you loose your ability to do address validation. Nowadays
this is vital due to real world circumstances as you have yourself
experienced. If
Title: Message
Yeah, I mixed up some words earlier in my reply to Sandy's post. I
should have said that it needed to be paired with or run as a
protocol/OnInBound sink that also does address validation. That's
probably what confused you as to the meaning of what I had said
earlier. I'm only
Hi folks,
I think I have ended up on some sort of private email list. Can you please
remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] from your mail list.
Thanks!
Ron Doss
Quoting Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It needs to be a transport sink, or at least work with one in order to
prevent
Hello,
Can you please remove me from your mail list. My address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks!
Ron
Quoting Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I guess you essentially got my point and what appears to be Sandy's.
Once you take an Exchange server (or any other server) and insert such
