I am seeing a lot of these get through
John T
eServices For You
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
On the weekend and since, I saw a lot of them get through but Sniffer
was dutifully catching them, unfortunately, they also served to
highlight Sniffer hyperaccuracy because those messages just weren't
reaching my HOLD weight.
Check out the Message Sniffer change rates for the last few days:
I noticed a significantly higher amount of spam get through in the last few
days. A few of them got tagged but didn't reach my delete weight. I didn't
notice if the majority were pharmaceuticals. I forwarded them all to
Sniffer, then . . . DELETE.
G.Z.
- Original Message -
From:
On Wednesday, April 13, 2005, 1:16:29 PM, John wrote:
JTL I am seeing a lot of these get through
Can you be specific about these ? Please send me a sipped plaintext
or message file. (to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Thanks,
_M
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information
Something I noticed about these. They are all using RE: or FW: and in the
body they have the original message line. SpamCheck had a line the
CheckWords giving negative 25 to that line. As such, SpamCheck was giving an
overall weight of -19 which was taking away from everything else the message
was
Attached is something that I coded up last night for this guy. It's
designed to be not totally dependant on one pattern so that it might
have some longevity. His forging of a Microsoft format is quite good,
but he does make mistakes and does leave patterns, some of which can be
tagged with a
