Anyway to stop this spam.
We are getting hundreds of them.
I have personally gotten 23.
From - Wed Feb 15 07:51:25 2006
X-Account-Key: account3
X-UIDL: 384485764
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
Received: from DM [206.53.51.56] by deepspace.i360.net
(SMTPD-8.22) id A08B07E0;
On Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 8:53:27 AM, Heimir wrote:
HE Anyway to stop this spam.
HE We are getting hundreds of them.
HE I have personally gotten 23.
It's a challenging one... there is almost no data, and the geocities
link is constantly different.
I've written another abstract to cover
Hello,
Could you please tell me what would cause an email to fail rule # 831417
This was a good email flagged this morning and deleted.
Regards,
Steve Guluk
SGDesign
(949) 661-9333
ICQ: 7230769
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription
Heimir,
It's not a Sniffer-related answer but I personaly use a combination of a
text filter file (looking for known geocities-links) and the IP-blacklist
SORBS-DUHL (who contains dialup ip-ranges). As all my customers are
connecting with SMTP-Auth or from known IP-ranges I can whitelist them. So
Hi Pete,
[]
If you wish, it is possible to create a local black rule for any
geocities link. On many ISP systems this would cause false positives,
but on more private systems it may be a reasonable solution.
I think I could use such a black rulw without getting to may FPs, but in
which
would you share your filters?
I assume Declude filters.
Cordially,
Heimir Eidskrem
i360, Inc.
2825 Wilcrest, Suite 675
Houston, TX 77042
Ph: 713-981-4900
Fax: 832-242-6632
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.i360.net
www.i360hosting.com
www.realister.com
Houston's Leading Internet Consulting Company
On Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 11:02:11 AM, Bonno wrote:
BB Hi Pete,
BB []
If you wish, it is possible to create a local black rule for any
geocities link. On many ISP systems this would cause false positives,
but on more private systems it may be a reasonable solution.
BB I think I
would you share your filters?
I assume Declude filters.
Yes.
Attached is the original message from Scott Fisher regarding the
geocities-filter file. (I call it GEOCITIESLINKS)
I've replaced each weight (100 and 75 points) with 0. So this test will add
no weight to the final result.
In
Hello Sniffer folks,
A surprising number of folks have asked about receiving 404 errors
when downloading their rulebase files. In all of these cases their
license has expired.
I recently added some new code to the server that delivers rulebase
files. The code removes any rulebase file
Answered off-list
_M
On Tuesday, February 14, 2006, 2:07:48 PM, Steve wrote:
SG Hello,
SG Could you please tell me what would cause an email to fail rule # 831417
SG This was a good email flagged this morning and deleted.
SG Regards,
SG Steve Guluk
SG SGDesign
SG (949) 661-9333
SG ICQ:
My users have been getting a lot of FPs by Sniffer lately. They send me
the email with the FULL HEADERS displayed and I forward this email on to
SortMonster. The program they use to analyze incoming submissions check
MY email headers, determine that SNIFFER was not at fault and sends me
back
Search your sniffer logs and include the log lines for that particular
message.
-Jay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Rogers
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 3:55 PM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: [sniffer] False Positives
On Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 3:54:50 PM, Kevin wrote:
KR My users have been getting a lot of FPs by Sniffer lately. They send me
KR the email with the FULL HEADERS displayed and I forward this email on to
KR SortMonster. The program they use to analyze incoming submissions check
KR MY email
Pete,
Is there anyway to get an automatic response similar to the one listed below
for the FP address, but for submissions to your spam@ address? It would be
nice to get some feedback when submitting spam.
Jim Matuska Jr.
Computer Tech2, CCNA
Nez Perce Tribe
Information Systems
[EMAIL
I second the motion. We have been submitting spam for over a year and I
don't know if a single one was received.
Thank you Jim, for the suggestion.
Michael Stein
Computer House
www.computerhouse.com
- Original Message -
From: Jim Matuska Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 4:32:14 PM, Robert wrote:
RG The X-SNF header. Sounds like a good idea. Is there a cheat sheet someplace
RG for making that happen, if possible, in a Declude / Imail environment?
RG Thanks ahead of time,
In the distribution the option is described in the .cfg
Jim,
Not at this time. The two processes are entirely different. The False
Positives process is highly interactive. The standardized responses
were implemented to allow for some automation on both sides.
Spam submissions are always treated as anonymous for security reasons
and also because of
On Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 4:48:43 PM, Computer wrote:
CHS I second the motion. We have been submitting spam for over a year and I
CHS don't know if a single one was received.
In general, if you've not received an error during delivery, we most
certainly got your message... it may have
18 matches
Mail list logo
