. Hope some people can learn from our pain!
Nick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: 14 March 2005 19:23
To: Nick Marshall
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Moving Sniffer to Declude/SmarterMail
On Monday, March 14, 2005, 12:47:33 PM
Thanks John - I didn't know that, but it would explain things...
Nick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: 16 March 2005 14:40
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Moving Sniffer to Declude
On Wednesday, March 16, 2005, 9:01:34 AM, Nick wrote:
NM Pete
NM OK, I now have much more information on this problem with
NM Declude/Sniffer/SmarterMail.
NM It seems the current version of Declude does not have an Overflow Directory
NM for SmarterMail, which therefore allows unlimited Declude
John,
It is a well known and published fact (on the Imail list) that RAID5
should
never ever be used for the spool directory or any other directory that
has
a
high write activity. This is basic physics. RAID5 should really only
be
used
for high read activity only, such as databases where
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: 16. marts 2005 17:43
Writing data to a raid 5 takes x+y+z amount of work where y
is described above and z is calculating a CRC stripe which
must now also be saved to a hard
be substantial.
Goran Jovanovic
The LAN Shoppe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 11:43 AM
To: Goran Jovanovic
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Moving Sniffer to Declude/SmarterMail
Now does anyone know how much overhead Windows 2000/2003 software RAID 1
on dynamic disks produces over hardware level RAID 1?
I am assuming it would be substantial.
I have never noticed an issue, and I would only assume there would be an
issue in higher end databases or where the CPU was
On Wednesday, March 16, 2005, 2:05:00 PM, Goran wrote:
GJ OK that is for hardware level RAID. I had thought that you would offset
GJ the extra processing time by being able to write less to each drive.
GJ Now does anyone know how much overhead Windows 2000/2003 software RAID 1
GJ on dynamic
On Monday, March 14, 2005, 12:47:33 PM, Nick wrote:
NM Hi there
NM We've just undergone a migration of a 1,000 domain iMail server to
NM SmarterMail (for obvious reasons!), and using Declude and Sniffer on the new
NM system.
NM However, occasionally we see Sniffer jumping out of its perpetual
