-
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Darin Cox sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] False positive processing
On Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 9:38:46 AM, Darin wrote:
DC
DC
DC Hi Pete,
DC
DC
DC
DC Are you getting behind on false positive processing
On average it takes 2 or three days to hear back on false positives.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 9:40 AM
Subject: [sniffer] False Positive - no reaction?
Hi,
I filed this false positive
I'm a little behind. I'm going to do false positives in the next 10
minutes. I only have 20 to do it should go fast. Sorry for the delay.
Thanks,
_M
On Tuesday, February 21, 2006, 9:40:07 AM, Andy wrote:
AS Hi,
AS I filed this false positive report a day ago and never heard back.
AS Just
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 09:55 AM
To: Andy Schmidt
Subject: Re: [sniffer] False Positive - no reaction?
I'm a little behind. I'm going to do false positives in the next 10 minutes.
I only have 20 to do
Answered off-list
_M
On Tuesday, February 14, 2006, 2:07:48 PM, Steve wrote:
SG Hello,
SG Could you please tell me what would cause an email to fail rule # 831417
SG This was a good email flagged this morning and deleted.
SG Regards,
SG Steve Guluk
SG SGDesign
SG (949) 661-9333
SG ICQ:
To: Ali Resting
Subject: Re: [sniffer] False positive
On Friday, September 9, 2005, 2:17:31 AM, Ali wrote:
AR Hi Peter,
AR I have submited 3 email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with all the required
AR fields as per you instaructions on the website, I have not received
any
AR feedback whether
Here is another copy of my initial reply.
_M
On Friday, September 9, 2005, 2:17:31 AM, Ali wrote:
AR Hi Peter,
AR I have submited 3 email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with all the required
AR fields as per you instaructions on the website, I have not received any
AR feedback whether this request has
On Friday, September 9, 2005, 2:17:31 AM, Ali wrote:
Apologies to the list... I intended to send those responses directly.
_M
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I'm pretty sure the rule that caused your trouble has been removed.
_M
On Thursday, August 4, 2005, 7:24:09 PM, Robert wrote:
RM After two attempts to email support and two attempts to
RM register a real false positive to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I would be
RM really grateful for some
We do respond to all false reports that are made to us if we can
properly identify the sender - and often even if that is not the case.
I will research this further and contact you off list.
Thanks,
_M
On Thursday, August 4, 2005, 7:24:09 PM, Robert wrote:
RM After two attempts to
pure-speculation
There is a lot of symantec spam out there (that looks like it's not
from them of course)... It's possible that something used in one of
those made it into their auto confirm, or that a robot picked
something up in a cross reference on a trap.
/pure-speculation
The only way to
11 matches
Mail list logo
