On Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 11:37:30 AM, Darin wrote:
DC Nope. None of them.
DC I haven't heard back from the replies to a couple of false positives on the
DC 10th, and we haven't heard anything from our submissions on the 16th (6) and
DC 17th (2). I don't remember if we've heard anything from
On Tuesday, February 21, 2006, 10:16:11 AM, Andy wrote:
AS Sorry - didn't mean to be pushy. I just thought that false positives are
AS worse than missed spam, so I had assumed that they would always be at the
AS top of the queue.
It is a very tough balancing act. Don't feel bad at all - you're
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 11:04 AM
To: Andy Schmidt
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] False Positive - no reaction?
On Tuesday, February 21, 2006, 10:16:11 AM, Andy wrote:
AS Sorry - didn't mean to be pushy. I just thought that false
I like this idea more than the email notification. I really don't need more
emails.
- Original Message -
From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:16 AM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] False Positive - no reaction?
Hi Pete
.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 11:16 AM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] False Positive - no reaction?
Hi Pete,
I agree that the email notification is tricky - because you might respond
, September 13, 2005 4:45 AM
To: John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] False positive
I have your response in my sent folder.
I will send it again..
_M
On Monday, September 12, 2005, 8:37:52 PM, John wrote:
JTL I also have sent some false positives in the last 2 weeks
I have your response in my sent folder.
I will send it again...
_M
On Monday, September 12, 2005, 8:37:52 PM, John wrote:
JTL I also have sent some false positives in the last 2 weeks with no response,
JTL the lastest being at 09/10/05 at 9:49 AM PDT.
JTL John T
JTL eServices For You
