So basically, what you are saying is that my volume is really
too low to take advantage of the persistent sniffer (and such
may actually decrease my performance), and I should stick
with the non-service version. Is that right? That is about
what I thought (without the details of how
Thanks, I will do that.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 3:17 AM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Sniffer taking a long time?
So basically, what you
After following through all of this and looking at the .stat file, I
think I see what's going on.
Now that it is running and producing a .stat file, the flow rate is
very low. According to the stat data, about 6 msgs / minute.
Note the poll and loop times are in the 450 - 550 ms range.
SNF with
works, I just
wanted to be sure).
Thanks, Pete.
Dan Horne
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 4:09 PM
To: Dan Horne
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Sniffer taking a long time?
After following
I replied to an off-list message from Pete, but for completeness, I will
repost it to the list. We can keep it on the list, Pete, if that does
ya'. It looks like Pete is probably right in that the service is
probably not loading correctly for some reason. There is no .stat file
in my sniffer
