Pete,
I have an additional question. What do you do with spam in foreign
languages, like dutch? Do you create rules for those as well? Lots of dutch
messages are not blocked by sniffer.
Regards,
Michiel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
On Monday, October 10, 2005, 11:46:36 PM, support wrote:
s Dear Pete,
s We had to reinstall Imail, and now I am not seeing any more TMP files in the
s spool folder. Everything seems to be working OK, but I miss those sweet
s little TMP files. Should I be concerned? What may have changed?
It is helpful to get the full headers, however it is simpler and more reliable
in most cases to simply forward the message.
_M
On Tuesday, October 11, 2005, 4:46:48 AM, Kevin wrote:
KR Can we just forward them regularly or do we need to change anything
KR about how the headers display when we
We attempt to create reliable rules no matter what language we see, however it
is more difficult to do that in foreign languages. We are working on upgrades
to our internal systems and procedures to address this. None the less there are
usually things within these messages that we can tag and
Sorry - I was talking about false positives. I assume we need to send
false positives to the false@ address.
Can my users send you these messages directly?
Or do they need to forward them to me first (as the registered user)?
And if they do need to forward false positives to me first, is it
I believe Pete is moving to a POP account approach. You would set up a POP
account for spam and another for false positives, and send them the login
info to it. Then have your users forward messages to the POP accounts as
attachments (that's the hardest part, which is why we still have them sent
I will answer this later in the thread.
_M
On Tuesday, October 11, 2005, 7:44:01 AM, Kevin wrote:
KR Sorry - I was talking about false positives. I assume we need to send
KR false positives to the false@ address.
KR Can my users send you these messages directly?
KR Or do they need to
I see the mailbox in the processing reports, and I have no indication
of any problems. My initial report was that it was pulling messages...
I have no reason to think this is broken. At the very least you should
see our system connecting and logging in.
That said, I've reviewed a number of
On Tuesday, October 11, 2005, 7:53:03 AM, Gulu wrote:
GC Hi Pete,
GC We have started forwarding spam to the mailbox. Are your robots pulling the
GC emails? As I don't see any activity in the logs.
Just to follow up...
Reading [EMAIL PROTECTED] X
The above is a line from a recent Trap Bot
On Tuesday, October 11, 2005, 9:42:59 AM, Pete wrote:
PM On Tuesday, October 11, 2005, 7:53:03 AM, Gulu wrote:
GC Hi Pete,
GC We have started forwarding spam to the mailbox. Are your robots pulling the
GC emails? As I don't see any activity in the logs.
PM Just to follow up...
Sorry, this was
On Tuesday, October 11, 2005, 10:20:19 AM, Stephen wrote:
First, re: the ERROR_RULE_AUTH condition, did you correct the typo I identified from your screen shot?
Second, when you do use FTP (which is not done by the auto update script) you do not need to change directories. In any case, you
Pete,
You're one of those "Reply-All" people aren't you :)
FYI, I had a customer press Reply-All on a message with 1,880
recipients on Thursday...he still can't use his account. The number of
recipients uncovered a bug in more than one E-mail server where it
couldn't figure out if it had
12 matches
Mail list logo
