Hello Sniffer Folks,
I will be making a significant upgrade to the Rule Strengths
Analysis program today. The upgrade will make the rule strength
calculation much more sensitive to the recent activity of any given
rule so that if a rule stops showing activity it's rule strength
will
Title: Message
Yep... send them to spam (at), from the email that
you have on record with them. Sending as an attachment so they get
complete headers is usually best, but they can also work with just the body of
the message.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Gary
Schick
To:
Title: Message
I've had quitea lot ofbounces (D/Q.GSE
pairs) in the past several weeks due to users with full mailboxes,99.999%
of them are bounces on spam. WhenI examine the quoted headers in the
D.GSE files, an appreciable number of them aren't failing any spam tests, and
seems like many
Title: Message
I am
also getting slammed with spam passing sniffer today also. Have not had a chance
to send them yet
Kevin
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
SchickSent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 3:48 PMTo:
sniffer@SortMonster.comSubject:
Title: Message
Yup. Under a heavy load during the daytime
and weekdays. Eases late at night, wee morn hours and
weekends.
- Original Message -
From: Jacques
Brouwers
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 4:37 PM
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Message Sniffer is
On Wednesday, November 2, 2005, 4:48:29 PM, Gary wrote:
We have had excellent results from Message Sniffer for severals years now.
However, in the past few days items that I feel should have been caught, were not.
Can I submit some samples to you? I would be glad to zip a couple of raw
On Wednesday, November 2, 2005, 4:56:07 PM, Glenn wrote:
I've had quite a lot of bounces (D/Q.GSE pairs) in the past several weeks due to users with full mailboxes, 99.999% of them are bounces on spam. When I examine the quoted headers in the D.GSE files, an appreciable number of them
