[sniffer] False Positive - no reaction?

2006-02-21 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi, I filed this false positive report a day ago and never heard back. Just trying to see if my emails are blocked again. Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: Andy Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006

Re: [sniffer] False Positive - no reaction?

2006-02-21 Thread Darin Cox
On average it takes 2 or three days to hear back on false positives. Darin. - Original Message - From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sniffer@SortMonster.com Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 9:40 AM Subject: [sniffer] False Positive - no reaction? Hi, I filed this false positive

[sniffer] Sharon Daniels is out of the office.

2006-02-21 Thread Sharon . Daniels
I will be out of the office starting 02/20/2006 and will not return until 03/20/2006. I will respond to your message when I return. If your request is urgent please resend your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or call 623-5700. Have a great day! Sharon This E-Mail came from the Message

Re: [sniffer] False Positive - no reaction?

2006-02-21 Thread Pete McNeil
I'm a little behind. I'm going to do false positives in the next 10 minutes. I only have 20 to do it should go fast. Sorry for the delay. Thanks, _M On Tuesday, February 21, 2006, 9:40:07 AM, Andy wrote: AS Hi, AS I filed this false positive report a day ago and never heard back. AS Just

RE: [sniffer] False Positive - no reaction?

2006-02-21 Thread Andy Schmidt
Sorry - didn't mean to be pushy. I just thought that false positives are worse than missed spam, so I had assumed that they would always be at the top of the queue. I can wait (PS - would have calmed my nerves, if there had been some automatic ticket number response that reassured me that my

Re[2]: [sniffer] False Positive - no reaction?

2006-02-21 Thread Pete McNeil
On Tuesday, February 21, 2006, 10:16:11 AM, Andy wrote: AS Sorry - didn't mean to be pushy. I just thought that false positives are AS worse than missed spam, so I had assumed that they would always be at the AS top of the queue. It is a very tough balancing act. Don't feel bad at all - you're

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] False Positive - no reaction?

2006-02-21 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi Pete, I agree that the email notification is tricky - because you might respond to spam - and, you may NOT respond to someone who did not use an authorized address. On the other hand, if I KNEW there was an auto-response and I did NOT get a response, it would be an indication to me, the user,

Re: Re[2]: [sniffer] False Positive - no reaction?

2006-02-21 Thread Scott Fisher
I like this idea more than the email notification. I really don't need more emails. - Original Message - From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sniffer@SortMonster.com Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:16 AM Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] False Positive - no reaction? Hi Pete,

Re: Re[2]: [sniffer] False Positive - no reaction?

2006-02-21 Thread Darin Cox
That queue concept would be wonderful! Hopefully it would have some simple info extracted to show recipient, sender, subject, header info, and info on the rule(s) it failed. One of my ongoing challenges is matching responses to reports and following up to see what additional actions are

Re[4]: [sniffer] False Positive - no reaction?

2006-02-21 Thread Pete McNeil
On Tuesday, February 21, 2006, 11:16:43 AM, Andy wrote: snip/ AS The only other suggestion I have is to create a 24 hour 'queue' display on AS the web site. All you need to show is a column of the sender domain names of AS the email (not the entire sender email address). If I submit a false AS