]: [sniffer] New Rulebot F001
On Monday, March 6, 2006, 3:42:50 PM, Darin wrote:
DC We just reviewed this morning's logs and had a few false positives.
DC Not sure if these are due to the new rulebot, but it's more than
DC we've had for the entire day for the past month.
DC Rules
DC --
DC
Hello Sniffer folks,
The first of the new rulebots is coming online.
Rulebot F001 creates IP rules for sources that consistently fail
many tests while also reaching the cleanest of our spamtraps.
The rules will appear in group 63.
The bot is playing catchup a bit (since there have
will let Declude know to weight these responses lower than normal
Sniffer.
- Jay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 3:00 PM
To: sniffer@sortmonster.com
Subject: [sniffer] New Rulebot F001
Hello Sniffer
- Handy Networks LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 3:13 PM
Subject: RE: [sniffer] New Rulebot F001
There's been at least one FP ;)
--
Rule - 861038
NameF001 for Message 2888327: [216.239.56.131]
Created 2006-03-02
Source
On Monday, March 6, 2006, 3:13:53 PM, Jay wrote:
JSHNL There's been at least one FP ;)
JSHNL --
JSHNL Rule - 861038
JSHNL NameF001 for Message 2888327: [216.239.56.131]
JSHNL Created 2006-03-02
JSHNL Source 216.239.56.131
JSHNL Hidden false
JSHNL Blocked false
On Monday, March 6, 2006, 3:42:50 PM, Darin wrote:
DC We just reviewed this morning's logs and had a few false positives. Not
DC sure if these are due to the new rulebot, but it's more than we've had for
DC the entire day for the past month.
DC Rules
DC --
DC 873261
DC 866398
DC 856734
To: Darin Cox
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] New Rulebot F001
On Monday, March 6, 2006, 3:42:50 PM, Darin wrote:
DC We just reviewed this morning's logs and had a few false
positives.
DC Not sure if these are due to the new rulebot, but it's more than
DC we've had for the entire day for the past
Thanks, Pete.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Darin Cox sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 6:17 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] New Rulebot F001
On Monday, March 6, 2006, 3:42:50 PM, Darin wrote:
DC We just reviewed this morning's
On Monday, March 6, 2006, 7:24:20 PM, Andrew wrote:
snip
CA I would like to state that I don't need Message Sniffer to
CA identify servers that send bogus postmaster notifications. This
CA would be entirely due to false positives such as the three
CA examples above.
CA Given that spammers