RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] New Rulebot F001

2006-03-08 Thread Support Traction IT
]: [sniffer] New Rulebot F001 On Monday, March 6, 2006, 3:42:50 PM, Darin wrote: DC We just reviewed this morning's logs and had a few false positives. DC Not sure if these are due to the new rulebot, but it's more than DC we've had for the entire day for the past month. DC Rules DC -- DC

[sniffer] New Rulebot F001

2006-03-06 Thread Pete McNeil
Hello Sniffer folks, The first of the new rulebots is coming online. Rulebot F001 creates IP rules for sources that consistently fail many tests while also reaching the cleanest of our spamtraps. The rules will appear in group 63. The bot is playing catchup a bit (since there have

RE: [sniffer] New Rulebot F001

2006-03-06 Thread Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC
will let Declude know to weight these responses lower than normal Sniffer. - Jay -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 3:00 PM To: sniffer@sortmonster.com Subject: [sniffer] New Rulebot F001 Hello Sniffer

Re: [sniffer] New Rulebot F001

2006-03-06 Thread Darin Cox
- Handy Networks LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sniffer@SortMonster.com Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 3:13 PM Subject: RE: [sniffer] New Rulebot F001 There's been at least one FP ;) -- Rule - 861038 NameF001 for Message 2888327: [216.239.56.131] Created 2006-03-02 Source

Re[2]: [sniffer] New Rulebot F001

2006-03-06 Thread Pete McNeil
On Monday, March 6, 2006, 3:13:53 PM, Jay wrote: JSHNL There's been at least one FP ;) JSHNL -- JSHNL Rule - 861038 JSHNL NameF001 for Message 2888327: [216.239.56.131] JSHNL Created 2006-03-02 JSHNL Source 216.239.56.131 JSHNL Hidden false JSHNL Blocked false

Re[2]: [sniffer] New Rulebot F001

2006-03-06 Thread Pete McNeil
On Monday, March 6, 2006, 3:42:50 PM, Darin wrote: DC We just reviewed this morning's logs and had a few false positives. Not DC sure if these are due to the new rulebot, but it's more than we've had for DC the entire day for the past month. DC Rules DC -- DC 873261 DC 866398 DC 856734

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] New Rulebot F001

2006-03-06 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
To: Darin Cox Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] New Rulebot F001 On Monday, March 6, 2006, 3:42:50 PM, Darin wrote: DC We just reviewed this morning's logs and had a few false positives. DC Not sure if these are due to the new rulebot, but it's more than DC we've had for the entire day for the past

Re: Re[2]: [sniffer] New Rulebot F001

2006-03-06 Thread Darin Cox
Thanks, Pete. Darin. - Original Message - From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Darin Cox sniffer@SortMonster.com Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 6:17 PM Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] New Rulebot F001 On Monday, March 6, 2006, 3:42:50 PM, Darin wrote: DC We just reviewed this morning's

Re[4]: [sniffer] New Rulebot F001

2006-03-06 Thread Pete McNeil
On Monday, March 6, 2006, 7:24:20 PM, Andrew wrote: snip CA I would like to state that I don't need Message Sniffer to CA identify servers that send bogus postmaster notifications. This CA would be entirely due to false positives such as the three CA examples above. CA Given that spammers