Somebody please tell me I'm doing something wrong here. I use this
expression in Baregrep Final\t828931 and it yields 22,055 matching
lines across 3 of my 4 license's log files.
Since this is set to my hold weight, I'm assuming that means I've had
22,055 holds on this rule?
--
Best regards,
I've had an internal note that our colo provider is working on a
networking problem. That's probably what you're seeing. Apparently it
doesn't effect all paths to the 'net equally and/or it may be solved
by now.
_M
On Tuesday, February 7, 2006, 5:53:35 PM, John wrote:
JC Agreed, my last report
On Tuesday, December 28, 2004, 12:49:21 PM, Jim wrote:
JM I agree that something needs to be done about the update scripts that are
JM inadvertently downloading the full rulebase all the time. I didn't even
JM know it but we were doing this until I went through our update script again
JM this
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jim Matuska sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:12 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
On Tuesday, December 28, 2004, 12:49:21 PM, Jim wrote:
JM I agree that something needs to be done about the update scripts that
are
JM inadvertently
sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:12 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
On Tuesday, December 28, 2004, 12:49:21 PM, Jim wrote:
JM I agree that something needs to be done about the update scripts that
are
JM inadvertently downloading the full rulebase all
- Original Message -
From: Jim Matuska [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
So far it seems to be working, at least it doesn't seem to be downloading
the rulebase yet, I'll have to see if it does
