On Wednesday, February 8, 2006, 10:59:09 AM, Darin wrote:
DC I have an idea. These problems seem to stem mostly from changes
DC in the methods of handling rulebase updates.
snip/
DC Would it be feasible to announce in advance when such changes
DC are to be implemented? With advance notice
that, and unfreeze once it was clear
that no glut of false positives would result.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Darin Cox sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 11:13 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] problems
On Wednesday, February 8
What is the correct Sniffer string in Declude Global.cfg
file.
SNIFFER external nonzero d:\imail\declude\sniffer\sniffer.exe
code12
0
of
SNIFFER external nonzero d:\imail\declude\sniffer\sniffer.exe
code10
0
Thanks
Filippo
On Wednesday, February 8, 2006, 11:06:07 AM, Markus wrote:
MG If a experimental rule showed to be reliable they move them in
MG the appropriate category (rich, fraud,...)
MG
MG
MG
MG I'm not sure about this but I think it's so and so it shouldn't
MG be necessary to do something like
